- Time of past OR future Camino
- Many, various, and continuing.
Remove ads on the forum by becoming a donating member. More here. |
---|
I should start by clarifying that I have walked the Salvador twice. The first time was before Ender put in the wooden post with the bifurcation to the coffin route. The second time was afterwards.
So, yes, FatmaG and I may be the only two here (or maybe Thomas´s wife also) to have walked the original camino. When the wooden post wasn´t there yet, that meant that you kept going till the point where my photo shows the mojón with the two conch shells. At that point there was a turn-off for Pajares, with an option to continue descending to San Miguel. And as Fatma says, the route to Pajares didn´t go down to San Miguel -- it had an earlier turn-off. The problem is finding that camino on Gunnar´s map, but it must still be there.
I walked the original route, back in 2008 or 2009. It was pretty, but I was tired by then and couldn´t enjoy it.
Oeps, sorry Susanna!And. It's Susanna, not Suzanne.
Thanks to Gunnar. I didn't know this either but he was the first one using bing maps in this thread. I was surprised too!Thank you Thomas that was a very good pic of the power lines.
I'm impressed by Bing maps btw. I didn't know they were so good. Much better than google earth.
you walked 500km on the road?
Waauw, there seems to be a seventh path...
you walked 500km on the road?
Waauw, there seems to be a seventh path...
Hello Laurie,
Is autovia maybe the name of a place? Because, there is no autovia - a track where cars can ride 120km/h on separate lanes - in the area.
The name of the bar that should be 200m before the agglomeration sign "Pajares" is "Meson El
t)
Hello Laurie,
Well here is in detail how the camino should be starting from "u", also known as the "no thanks"-point, till Pajares without touching the N630. "x" should be the place where the coffin would arrive.
)
Wonderful, how did you do that? So does this mean that the entire mystery of the path between Puerto de Pajares and Pajares pueblo is now solved?! Maybe this will earn you a plenary indulgence from the Salvador. Thanks, Gunnar, but I am going to miss these discussions. Laurie
Wonderful, how did you do that? So does this mean that the entire mystery of the path between Puerto de Pajares and Pajares pueblo is now solved?! Maybe this will earn you a plenary indulgence from the Salvador. Thanks, Gunnar, but I am going to miss these discussions. Laurie
While you are up there, you might as well do the Vadiniense, too!
Dear Staff Members of PdPF,
I updated our knowledge on a screenshot of Bing Maps which offers more details than Google Maps in our dedicated sector.
I learnt that in fact between point 4 and the old parador, there are 2 railroad sections.
It seems that the School Kids Path stays parallel with the N630.
***UPDATE*** you can see on this map that there is also a path between the bar and the blue path, call it a shortcut. Just before the building of the bar, it's easy to reach this shortcut (check google streetview). But it's possible you have to go through a barbered wire, so it's better to go back to the silo.
View attachment 6390
Gunnar,
your last map has attracted all my interest...
I would like to study what is (not visible) at the left.
Because did I walk as it was marked (so at the no thanks point, taking the left path?)
Or might there be another path coming from the Puerta direction and reaching Pajares at the point q?
Because (Laurie, I am sorry I need more hypnosis) the picture and point 9 don't tell me anything...
(But, dear PdP-friends, as I said already : thanks to this and to you, I really would like to go back there again...)
Stuart:
Your picture of a natural spring???? If you look to the left there is a trickle of water coming down the slope. When I passed there this spring, it was a raging water fall. It overwhelmed the drainage pipes. I would be cautious of drinking water from here. Especially with all the cattle and wildlife.
Gunnar:
The U>Q>X>B>C is definitely the route I walked in April
Joe
Hi, Fatma,
I THINK that when we walked the "original route", we went on the pink route. (as seen on Gunnar's map posted on Monday at 6:29 pm) At point 7 is where the conch shell is that I photographed, splitting the route between San Miguel and Pajares. The yellow route is Ender's new shortcut, marked with a wooden post and two arrows, one towards albergue (Pajares) and the other towards San Miguel (in other words that is the same split we found a few kms further on). When we walked, that yellow route wasn't there, so we had a few extra kms.
Good advice and I was thinking the same but the ski champion was very insistent that the water was the best around. He may, however, have been chuckling at home that night
Si él te dijo que era potable, lo sería, no creo que engañara con eso.
¿Notaste algo raro esa noche?.
El no bebió el agua, el salió rápidamente
Hi, Fatma,
I THINK that when we walked the "original route", we went on the pink route. (as seen on Gunnar's map posted on Monday at 6:29 pm) At point 7 is where the conch shell is that I photographed, splitting the route between San Miguel and Pajares. The yellow route is Ender's new shortcut, marked with a wooden post and two arrows, one towards albergue (Pajares) and the other towards San Miguel (in other words that is the same split we found a few kms further on). When we walked, that yellow route wasn't there, so we had a few extra kms.
And Gunnar's post of the map from 8:51 today shows the route after the pink and yellow paths merge, all the way into Pajares.
But I am pretty sure that the only differencesbetween walking in 2009 and walking in 2012 were: (1) Ender put up the shortcut coffin route marker and (2) Ender put the arrows on the "dangerous route" in front of the parador. So you probably didn't see that alternative either.
And yes, the only answer here is that we all need to return to the Salvador, the sooner the better. And hope that our incessant postings about the route will not entice hundreds of other forum members to walk the Salvador and crowd it up. Of course, if they think that the average pilgrim on the Salvador is as nutty as we are, they will probably be dissuaded from going.
Hi, Fatma,
I THINK that when we walked the "original route", we went on the pink route. (as seen on Gunnar's map posted on Monday at 6:29 pm) At point 7 is where the conch shell is that I photographed, splitting the route between San Miguel and Pajares. The yellow route is Ender's new shortcut, marked with a wooden post and two arrows, one towards albergue (Pajares) and the other towards San Miguel (in other words that is the same split we found a few kms further on). When we walked, that yellow route wasn't there, so we had a few extra kms.
And Gunnar's post of the map from 8:51 today shows the route after the pink and yellow paths merge, all the way into Pajares.
But I am pretty sure that the only differencesbetween walking in 2009 and walking in 2012 were: (1) Ender put up the shortcut coffin route marker and (2) Ender put the arrows on the "dangerous route" in front of the parador. So you probably didn't see that alternative either.
And yes, the only answer here is that we all need to return to the Salvador, the sooner the better. And hope that our incessant postings about the route will not entice hundreds of other forum members to walk the Salvador and crowd it up. Of course, if they think that the average pilgrim on the Salvador is as nutty as we are, they will probably be dissuaded from going.
Good morning!
2. I want to find out a good place for a base camp. Where one can stay if one wants to walk all options from Puerto de Pajares to Pajares. There's got to be small pensions etc in other places than Pajares, in the area?
This thread is a lovely example of what makes the San Salvador so appealing to a small number of people. It is really quite challenging, geographically (steep) and zoologically (cows), and sometimes automotively (a mountain highway full of speeding camiones) and meteorologically. The waymarks are sometimes tricky. The maps are being revised, and are hard or impossible to figure out in advance.
In short, you don´t know just what you are in for. There´s an enticing element of actual danger involved, but not insane, Everest-level danger. (There are a couple of bars, after all!) You have to be pretty fit, and you have to do it when the weather is good. You have to be sensible and prepared and very flexible.
It is NOT for everybody. And for those of us who enjoy nature, solitude, and a frisson of risk, that is a wonderful thing indeed.
there is a casa rural in Pajares Pueblo: http://www.valgrande-pajares.com/centraldereservas/alojamiento-posada-real-de-pajares.html
Reb if I had read your very descriptive post a few months ago I would have certainly decided it was not a good fit with kids;-) But you said we'd make it so I'll believe you! Indeed, it's the slight element of actual risk that is enticing (and the scenery beckons - I have not admitted this elsewhere, but we found the scenery from Astorga to Santiago in September pretty underwhelming. Not green, but not autumnal. A few hills, but smaller than where we live. We are blessed to be in NZ and have amazing vistas wherever we go, so our little camino walk was a bit of a disappointment on that front - absolutely wonderful on other levels though. I have high hopes for the Salvador and will be looking out for otters.)
I've almost summoned up the courage to go back and look at the maps above.
Just preparing my coffin first.
And as you walk on paths where people for centuries have carried their coffins, you will be grateful that you're not in one yet and you will give thanks and be in the moment.
Susanna, I think Pajares or Campomanes is about all there is. Anyway, Pajares would be a good base as one of the end points, or you could break into the parador and set up camp there.
If you like regular coffee breaks ( and don't have the electric coil! ) , regular snacks and meals, plenty of wi fi, company, are not reasonably fit and are not comfortable with the slight element of risk, this route is definitely not for you.
Kiwifamily , I think you will love it! When are you going?
Hello Laurie and Fatma,
How did you guess about the map?
Yes, yesterday evening I was thinking how the lay out needs to be.
But give me some time, I will make a clear map between Arbas and Pajares.
I will come back with another short possibility using the red/white gate (last picture). Did anyone see this gate?
Fatma,
Your camino was like this, I hope I'm right
Check the map I posted on Friday 11/10/2013 12:34 - post #23 (right corner bottom)
Starting at the emergency track
At "4" you came down and followed San Miguel on the map
Check the map I posted on Monday 14/10/2013 7:29 PM - post #72
Now you followed the pink trail clockwise
Check the picture I posted on Sunday 13/10/2013 5:55 PM - post #52
The pink trail ends on the "t"
You walked till "u"
Check the map I posted Wednesday 16/10/2013 9:51 AM - post #108
The second picture is point "u"
You walked on the yellow dots.
I wonder which part of your brain is missing in my brain?
Hello dear peregrinos and -as,
I've made a final map. It's over 3 pages and I sent it to Laurie for final approval. It contains even some pictures of critical points.
As soon the queen of the peregrinas approved it, it will be shared.
Thank you all for your input.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?