- Time of past OR future Camino
- Frances 15,16,18
VdlP 23, Invierno 23, Fisterra 23
Hi everyone,
I'm down to buying the last few items of my gear before heading off on my first Camino at the end of April.
I would really value some feedback from our more experienced members on backup footwear. And yes I appreciate that this is a very personal choice, but the experiences of others would be helpful nonetheless.
I started out being paranoid about weight. Still am a bit...
So my first thoughts were to take Crocs. Wear at night and for emergency use if blisters got bad. And of course they are lightweight.
I'm tending now to think that 'hiking' sandals might be a better option for me. I like the idea of being able to use them if the weather is warm/dry, and being able to give my feet a 'break'.
I started looking at the really lightweight versions and have tried on quite a few pairs.
My research so far has concluded....
The lighter versions, (OK mid weight versions) only have straps.
http://www.paddypallin.com.au/teva-terra-fi-4-sandal-mens.html
http://www.paddypallin.com.au/teva-toachi-2-leather-sandal-mens.html
Not being used to wearing sandals I found these felt a bit strange and immediately thought that having only 2 or 3 points of contact with my feet, via the straps, chafing was likely to be a big issue. Not sure if that happens in reality though....
So I then tried some of the heavier versions.
They felt really good. Very comfortable. And when walking on inclines (up and down) my feet felt secure and not sign of chafing.
These were somewhat more open. Probably better for drying out blisters etc.
http://www.paddypallin.com.au/keen-newport-h2-sandal-mens.html
And these were even more comfortable. But fast starting to look like hiking shoes....
http://www.paddypallin.com.au/teva-kimtah-sandal-mens.html
So my dilemma is this.
I want to have some backup footwear, that I could actually walk in for a couple of days if I needed to.
The idea being to get some relief from my boots if I get blisters. So they would need to allow plenty of air circulation and not 'rub' in the spots where I might have blisters.
This would seem to point to 'open' sandals, that are secured with 2 or 3 straps only. But are these comfortable for walking. Do they take a lot of 'wearing in' to get over potential chaffing from the straps?
Or might it be better to go for something more enclosed?
Just found an interesting review, which has me leaning towards open sandals....
http://www.outdoorgearlab.com/Sandals-Reviews/Buying-Advice
I'm down to buying the last few items of my gear before heading off on my first Camino at the end of April.
I would really value some feedback from our more experienced members on backup footwear. And yes I appreciate that this is a very personal choice, but the experiences of others would be helpful nonetheless.
I started out being paranoid about weight. Still am a bit...
So my first thoughts were to take Crocs. Wear at night and for emergency use if blisters got bad. And of course they are lightweight.
I'm tending now to think that 'hiking' sandals might be a better option for me. I like the idea of being able to use them if the weather is warm/dry, and being able to give my feet a 'break'.
I started looking at the really lightweight versions and have tried on quite a few pairs.
My research so far has concluded....
The lighter versions, (OK mid weight versions) only have straps.
http://www.paddypallin.com.au/teva-terra-fi-4-sandal-mens.html
http://www.paddypallin.com.au/teva-toachi-2-leather-sandal-mens.html
Not being used to wearing sandals I found these felt a bit strange and immediately thought that having only 2 or 3 points of contact with my feet, via the straps, chafing was likely to be a big issue. Not sure if that happens in reality though....
So I then tried some of the heavier versions.
They felt really good. Very comfortable. And when walking on inclines (up and down) my feet felt secure and not sign of chafing.
These were somewhat more open. Probably better for drying out blisters etc.
http://www.paddypallin.com.au/keen-newport-h2-sandal-mens.html
And these were even more comfortable. But fast starting to look like hiking shoes....
http://www.paddypallin.com.au/teva-kimtah-sandal-mens.html
So my dilemma is this.
I want to have some backup footwear, that I could actually walk in for a couple of days if I needed to.
The idea being to get some relief from my boots if I get blisters. So they would need to allow plenty of air circulation and not 'rub' in the spots where I might have blisters.
This would seem to point to 'open' sandals, that are secured with 2 or 3 straps only. But are these comfortable for walking. Do they take a lot of 'wearing in' to get over potential chaffing from the straps?
Or might it be better to go for something more enclosed?
Just found an interesting review, which has me leaning towards open sandals....
http://www.outdoorgearlab.com/Sandals-Reviews/Buying-Advice
Last edited: