But it also begs the question - if calls could get through then why didn't they call for help?
Clearly they didn't feel they needed it. Just because you've gotten a little lost doesn't mean you have to automatically call for help. Especially if they were reasonably equipped. Although bouncing around from one trail to the other does sound as though they couldn't read a simple map, either that or they didn't have one with them.
Their
biggest failure was not notifying whoever was expecting them out that they were safe, and would be delayed.
I'm also curious as to why their anchor person didn't attempt to call them. (No mention is made of any attempts in the story, possibly just another failure on the reporters part).
Yes, it would have been smart to have answered the call from the unknown number on the second attempt, but hey maybe they get of get a lot of scam callers.
If I was just out in the local area then I would tell my anchor ( the person I've given my itinerary to) to call it in approximately four hours after my expected exit time. Which would itself be
at least two hours later than I hoped. On a full day hike in 'the wild' my practice is that 10am the next morning would be my "overdue time" in most cases. ( Midday in winter) Sometimes you simply need daylight to safely extract yourself.
I would add that the headline is as usual incredibly misleading. It said that the person was 'missing for 24 hours' which is completely incorrect according to the text. Yes, it took them more than 24 hours from the time they left to the time they returned home but they were not 'missing' for that period.
And the story from
@K_Lynn (whilst ironically funny) shows how poorly organised the tour bus leaders were. A simple head count would have solved that long before starting a search. Hardly surprising the poor woman didn't recognize her own description (she knew
she wasn't missing) - I shudder to think how people would describe me!
Mistakes made, sensationalized by poor reporting.