Richard Schwartz
New Member
I just hiked the beautiful Via Francigena in Italy, from San Miniato, near Florence, to Rome, encompassing 18 hiking days. Some perspective, I'm a Camino addict and a veteran of routes in Spain, France and Portugal.
I have mostly good things to say about the trip: the scenery, especially the hills of Tuscany, was outstanding and I can easily say it was consistently prettier than the other lovely Caminos I've walked. Similarly, there are beautiful ancient churches and medieval towns throughout the trek.
Also important, the signposting is excellent and frequent, just as good as the Camino Frances. The level of difficulty was about the same.
You've probably read elsewhere that there are very few fellow hikers on the Via Francigena, and that held true for me. At peak, I was with about 6 other walkers during a given day, yet I also went more than a week without seeing any.
I went with MacsAdventure, a UK outfit that reserves hotel rooms for you in advance (as opposed to hostels), and transports your big baggage inn to inn, allowing you to walk with just a daypack. I mention this because I can't speak firsthand on the availability of dormitory-type facilities.
However, I asked fellow walkers along the way about this and they said they were always able to find a bed but that the quality varied greatly. Several of these people began in Lausanne and one from Canterbury, England, which is the official start of the pilgrimage.
I was also told that the whole route in Italy was as gorgeous as in Tuscany.
All in all, a great experience, so much so that I'm planning to do a long northern leg in the next year or two.
I predict the Via Francigena, which has as much, if not more, to offer than the Camino de Santiago, will be a very well-traveled route as people become veterans of the other routes and seek further adventures. The Francigena, which started as early as the 7th century is actually several hundred years older than the Camino de Santiago...
I have mostly good things to say about the trip: the scenery, especially the hills of Tuscany, was outstanding and I can easily say it was consistently prettier than the other lovely Caminos I've walked. Similarly, there are beautiful ancient churches and medieval towns throughout the trek.
Also important, the signposting is excellent and frequent, just as good as the Camino Frances. The level of difficulty was about the same.
You've probably read elsewhere that there are very few fellow hikers on the Via Francigena, and that held true for me. At peak, I was with about 6 other walkers during a given day, yet I also went more than a week without seeing any.
I went with MacsAdventure, a UK outfit that reserves hotel rooms for you in advance (as opposed to hostels), and transports your big baggage inn to inn, allowing you to walk with just a daypack. I mention this because I can't speak firsthand on the availability of dormitory-type facilities.
However, I asked fellow walkers along the way about this and they said they were always able to find a bed but that the quality varied greatly. Several of these people began in Lausanne and one from Canterbury, England, which is the official start of the pilgrimage.
I was also told that the whole route in Italy was as gorgeous as in Tuscany.
All in all, a great experience, so much so that I'm planning to do a long northern leg in the next year or two.
I predict the Via Francigena, which has as much, if not more, to offer than the Camino de Santiago, will be a very well-traveled route as people become veterans of the other routes and seek further adventures. The Francigena, which started as early as the 7th century is actually several hundred years older than the Camino de Santiago...