I made that categorical statement in another thread, and a wise moderator suggested we take it elsewhere so as to not derail the subject under discussion there.
Still, by popular demand, I will explain myself.
The first part is a no-brainer: There are some people who simply are not cut out for long-distance hikes, physically or mentally. A 700 km. walk, or even the minimum requirement of 100 km., would be detrimental to their health. They would quickly fall ill or hurt themselves if they attempted it.
Inflexible people might think twice about walking the camino.
Some people do not get on well in uncontrolled environments. The idea of coping with other languages, strange food and water, money and beds and bathrooms is just too much for them. A guided tour is as far from their comfort zone as they are willing to go.
Some do not appreciate people of other cultures, colors, or beliefs. They feel compelled to speak out against people who behave or represent things that make them uncomfortable.
Some people can´t handle discomfort, inconvenience, or unmet expectations. When faced with any, they complain, rage, sulk, or behave in ways designed to spread their misery.
Then there are people whose economic or social positions bar them from camino-walking. 150,000 people per year seems like a lot of pilgrims, but that´s a pretty small percentage of the whole world´s population. I daresay the majority of humanity would find a pilgrimage across Spain is just bizarre, or just not their cup of tea. And that´s OK by me.
The
Camino de Santiago is not for everyone. Or perhaps it is better said, Not everyone is for the
Camino de Santiago.