Remove ads on the forum by becoming a donating member. More here. |
---|
Do you know of any possible routes that might have a solid historical foundation to justify bringing them back into existence as a set of modern complementary routes? Others might have a view on this, but I recall some sections of the CF that appeared to have been rerouted, more so within towns than in the countryside, to suit the commercial interests of one or another group or person. That wasn't particularly popular then, but what you appear to be proposing appears to be on a different scale to a couple of albergue or bar owners doing a little creative repainting.I think the people of Galicia should consider creating an alternative route
after Portomarin.
I am curious what your reason is - i.e. why does this section need a new route?the place they could use one the most doesn't have one.
I’m sure that your ideas have great value, especially given your experience with building over 10 miles of National Scenic Trail in Wisconsin. It made me giggle a bit, though. The Camino de Santiago, nowadays commonly known as Camino Francés, is something quite unique and that has to do with its historic/historical significance. Goes back to the Middle Ages. Has to do with what is still left from that time.And I'm not too worried about the historical aspect of it.
There are already several alternative routes on the Camino Frances,
but perhaps the place they could use one the most doesn't have one.
I think the people of Galicia should consider creating an alternative route
after Portomarin. Perhaps having the alternative go through Monterroso.
The reason the variant has to be after Portomarin is that bridges over
the River Mino are few and far between.
Perhaps I am too conservative on this. I don't see creating another route as necessarily the best solution. But, if some group of local councils get motivated to work together, as they appear to have done to create the Variente Espiritual, something might happen to complement the growth needed along the more traditional parts of the CF route.
Isn't it obvious. Lot's of people have been complaining that section is too crowded.I am curious what your reason is - i.e. why does this section need a new route?
There is already the option of branching off the Frances on to the Invierno at Ponferrada. Or perhaps those who prefer a less travelled route should simply disregard the Compostela rules and make their way to Santiago by whatever route they like. Is it worth sticking with a path you find unpleasant just for that piece of paper? I use the waymarked Caminos for convenience - I do not feel obliged to stick to them and I no longer ask for a Compostela on arrival in Santiago.Isn't it obvious. Lot's of people have been complaining that section is too crowded.
Providing a less traveled and more peaceful route will appeal to a lot of people
yeah, I already know about the Inveirno. It's 3 days longer than the Frances.There is already the option of branching off the Frances on to the Invierno at Ponferrada. Or perhaps those who prefer a less travelled route should simply disregard the Compostela rules and make their way to Santiago by whatever route they like. Is it worth sticking with a path you find unpleasant just for that piece of paper? I use the waymarked Caminos for convenience - I do not feel obliged to stick to them and I no longer ask for a Compostela on arrival in Santiago.
There are already a number of these, all official routes. Examples are the Caminos Invierno, Primativo, Ingles, Sanabres - all of which can be started 100kms from Santiago.Providing a less traveled and more peaceful route will appeal to a lot of people
The "they" is whoever is in charge of the Camino in Galicia.It has been a pilgrimage route since 1000+ years ...
And who is supposed to be the 'they' that should make an alternate route?
I am always open to exploring options. However, this sounds like the start of a promotional campaign. My view would be that any broadly equivalent alternative will fill up until both routes are carrying about the same amount of pilgrims, and both will face the same issues of crowding at certain times of the year and relative abundance at others.I guess the question should be, if there is a less traveled and more peaceful route through
Galicia, would you take it?
I would, if it were the Camino Frances. But I would think twice about walking if I felt that the route lacked historical context. Walking a trail that, by the nature of its heritage listing, has been proven to have hosted pilgrims over the centuries will always be more significant than walking something without that provenance.If you are hiking the Camino Frances a second time
would you like to take a slightly different route?
I know that there are aspects of our lives where believing something is enough to make it true. I don't think this is one of them.I believe that any town that is somewhat
close to the main camino has a history of pilgrims hiking through their town.
I suspect those that know the extensive efforts put into researching the route, both to bring it back to life, so to speak, and all that has been done since, will object to this. It has been defined by history, and we now make the best of walking on those parts that remain available to walkers.In fact, it has
been fairly recently that the camino as we know is has been defined.
Really!! I wonder how many times some of the more venerable members have to repeat that there is no-one in charge of the Camino, in Galicia, or anywhere else. To suggest this suggests a very shallow understanding of the nature of the Camino itself and the people who make it work from the individual albergue and other business owners through religious associations, local and regional government and the cathedral authorites in Santiago. This endeavour is not some centrally managed activity, but a collective effort with many individuals and organisations working within their own remits undertaking smaller or larger parts that amazingly come together to make it work for all of us.The "they" is whoever is in charge of the Camino in Galicia.
There's really no one in charge of the Camino in Galicia? How did the 100 km rule come into existance? When I hiked the camino there was a work crew of people with weedwackers/brushcutters working on the hedgerows of the camino. Who is paying them? At some point everything about the camino has been decided by some group or entity. So, whoever they are, they should consider this. I think it would be great for the CaminoReally!! I wonder how many times some of the more venerable members have to repeat that there is no-one in charge of the Camino, in Galicia, or anywhere else.
You really don't get it, do you! The cathedral sets rules for receiving the Compostela. They also provide or authorize a form of credencial that allows those who wish to provide their bona fides as pilgrims to do so, which can be important at some albergues, but isn't always. Local councils and the xunta and other regional governments look after their urban and rural infrastructure as much for their own rate and tax payer as for any pilgrims that also pass through, various associations look after albergues, and might coordinate some of their efforts through peak bodies, but that is not direction. These are not efforts directed by some central authority. It just doesn't happen that way.There's really no one in charge of the Camino in Galicia? How did the 100 km rule come into existance? When I hiked the camino there was a work crew of people with weedwackers/brushcutters working on the hedgerows of the camino. Who is paying them? At some point everything about the camino has been decided by some group or entity. So, whoever they are, they should consider this. I think it would be great for the Camino
I guess you did not ask them? Then we would know ... Do you read Spanish? This is from the website of the regional government of Galicia about how the Camino is kept tidy:When I hiked the camino there was a work crew of people with weedwackers/brushcutters working on the hedgerows of the camino. Who is paying them? At some point everything about the camino has been decided by some group or entity. So, whoever they are, they should consider this
Cleaning the Camino is different than maintaining itLa acción cuenta con la participación de más de 400 voluntarios repartidos en 48 albergues de 8 provincias, coordinados por 14 asociaciones.
So, you willfully list a bunch of entities that are in charge of the Camino. Thank You!!!!You really don't get it, do you! The cathedral sets rules for receiving the Compostela. They also provide or authorize a form of credencial that allows those who wish to provide their bona fides as pilgrims to do so, which can be important at some albergues, but isn't always. Local councils and the xunta and other regional governments look after their urban and rural infrastructure as much for their own rate and tax payer as for any pilgrims that also pass through, various associations look after albergues, and might coordinate some of their efforts through peak bodies, but that is not direction. These are not efforts directed by some central authority. It just doesn't happen that way.
One can always stop on the Camino Frances at Sarria, and travel to Monforte de Lemos on the Camino de Invierno. IIRC, the distance from Monforte de Lemos to Santiago, along the Camino de Invierno is 134 km or thereabouts.It is an interesting idea and IMO worth pursuing a bit further, at least as a thought exercise.
Those who would aspire to earn a compostela after walking a new route would be wise to note that this webpage:
states: "The last 100 km must be done by any of the routes recognized as official by the S. A. M. I. Cathedral of Santiago."The Credencial: Pilgrim’s Reception Office
The official Credencial of the Pilgrim’s Officeoficinadelperegrino.com
I understand that the Camino de Invierno:
passes to the south of Monterosso. That might or might not be relevant.
Creating and maintaining infrastructure is done by those entities who own it or who own the land it is on. This may be centralised in Galicia, I can't be bothered to find out. I once wrote to a number of entities in Navarra with a suggestion to improve the trail down from the Alto del Pardon, for example creating a sections of the trail that had a zig-zag form. I got a friendly reply where "they" agreed and said that they are aware of the fact that the trail is accident prone but changing it would be expensive as it would entail expropriation of land. BTW, I did not do this for myself, I had no trouble walking down and I did it faster than most.Cleaning the Camino is different than maintaining it
I think the question of taking a different route home to Santiago can only be answered by the individual pilgrim. Right now there are lots of different alternatives. There is the Ingles, Primitivo, Sanabria, Norte and Portugues. A short bus ride from Sarria or somewhere near that can put you on an alternative route to avoid the "parade". It is just your choice, IMO anyway.I guess the question should be, if there is a less traveled and more peaceful route through
Galicia, would you take it? If you are hiking the Camino Frances a second time
would you like to take a slightly different route? I believe that any town that is somewhat
close to the main camino has a history of pilgrims hiking through their town. In fact, it has
been fairly recently that the camino as we know is has been defined.
Who is to build and maintain pilgrim albergues and the other infrastructure that pilgrims need on this new alternative?Isn't it obvious. Lot's of people have been complaining that section is too crowded.
Providing a less traveled and more peaceful route will appeal to a lot of people
Oh, sorry. It wasn't obvious in your post that you were thinking of the entire route after Portomarin to Santiago. I thought you were talking about one stage after Portomarín, due to a problem with the path.Isn't it obvious. Lot's of people have been complaining that section is too crowded.
The cathedral in Santiago decides the rules for Compostelas, including what routes qualify. However, they have no part in the signage, path construction, baggage transport, albergues, private rooms, or other facilities that people will expect before they flock to new routes.There's really no one in charge of the Camino in Galicia? How did the 100 km rule come into existance?
Yes, there are many local entities with responsibilities for many of the pieces that make up the Camino. That is why decisions are so hard - they involve many responsible parties, each with different interests and priorities., you willfully list a bunch of entities that are in charge of the Camino.
If only it were that easy. There's plenty of bureaucracy and red tape in the US. There's a group in Los Angeles who isn't waiting for the powers that be to paint crosswalks at some critical intersections and has been doing it themselves. Unfortunately, when the authorities discover these citizen created crosswalks they paint over them.I have to admire the 'can-do' attitudes of our North American pilgrims. There isn't an issue that can't be sorted with a will and I do not doubt they could achieve it given some co-operation with the authorities.
The New World Method: Build it and they will come.
One thing I have wondered about is why the Camino no longer goes past the Vilar de Donas church, or did it ever go past it or was it part of a different route.The "they" is whoever is in charge of the Camino in Galicia.
Again, I believe in the power of suggestions.
Back in 2010 I hiked both the Kekekabic Trail and Border Route Trail
parts of the North Country National Scenic Trail. On the Kek, I encountered
several people who were on the Kek hiking a loop, because there are
a few loop trails that use the Kek as part of their system. I didn't see anybody
like that on the Border Route Trail, because they didn't have a loop associated
with their Trail. So, I contacted the Border Route Trail Association and
suggested they build a loop connection so people would use the BRT
more often. They mulled it over and figured where was the best spot
for the loop. They proposed to the Forest Service the Moss Lake Trail
which goes between the South Lake Trail and the Cariboo Rock Trail,
two trails that connect to the Border Route. It was approved and the
BRTA built the 2.9 mile Moss Lake Trail that created a 14 mile stunning
loop in the Boundary Waters Wilderness. I did the map for the loop
because I am talented that way. Here it is:
It was the least I could do for them.
The power of suggestions is great.
Good question. I walked the CF in 2010 and again in 2016. The route that I took both times followed the road from Airexe to A Brea, some 2 km south of Vilar de Donas. The current CF route alignment hasn't changed from that, so any change wasn't recent.One thing I have wondered about is why the Camino no longer goes past the Vilar de Donas church, or did it ever go past it or was it part of a different route.
Good question. I walked the CF in 2010 and again in 2016. The route that I took both times followed the road from Airexe to A Brea, some 2 km south of Vilar de Donas. The current CF route alignment hasn't changed from that, so any change wasn't recent.
I'm not sure how a route through Vilar de Donas would work coming from Portomarin. Just looking at the OSM mapping on the web, there doesn't appear to be any existing road or track network that would make it a more direct route to Melide than the current alignment. Do you have any information on the routing that might have existed to include this on the CF route?
I am neither agreeing or disagreeing with what you wrote. However, this is the start of a generalized discussion of national/cultural differences and attitudes that have very limited connection to the Camino. The issues that are relevant to this thread have been pointed out already. The bull-fighting example is not a very good one for this case, as I don't think the decisions (about routing the path) involve a fundamental clash of principles/morals. 'Nuf said.We Norte Americanos tend to
I believe in the power of
suggestions and some of my suggestions have become reality.
At some point everything about the camino has been decided by some group or entity. So, whoever they are, they should consider this
This misrepresents my post. My point is that none of these organizations are in charge of the Camino. If any conceptual structure explains the Camino today, it is that its properties are emergent - greater than the sum its parts, none of which could be removed without taking away more than its individual contribution. Amazingly for many, while it might have started with a single, motivated, individual, this has continued through collaboration, participation and collective coordination of the various parties.So, you willfully list a bunch of entities that are in charge of the Camino. Thank You!!!!
I'm not so sure I can agree that it has been fairly recently that the camino as we know it has been defined. That may be true for a number of the modern Camino routes but for the Camino Frances (and the Camino Aragones which didn't used to be distinguished from the Camino Frances) it is pretty clearly not true. I've got a number of Camino guides dating from the 80s and earlier and all ground themselves pretty firmly in the 12th century definition of the Camino de Santiago as set forth in the Codex Calixtinus. I don't think a 12th century definition can be called "fairly recently".I guess the question should be, if there is a less traveled and more peaceful route through
Galicia, would you take it? If you are hiking the Camino Frances a second time
would you like to take a slightly different route? I believe that any town that is somewhat
close to the main camino has a history of pilgrims hiking through their town. In fact, it has
been fairly recently that the camino as we know is has been defined.
The Camino is not the Rainbow Gathering. The Camino has people and groups making decisions about it. Yes, there may be many factions deciding stuff, but they are deciding it. Meanwhile, the Rainbow People and Gathering have intentionally no leader or nobody in charge of anything. That way when they make an encampment in the National Forest, nobody can be sued. Maybe, we could solve the Camino problem by going back and not having ANY official routes. Just let people hike to Santiago the way they see fit. It's already been reported that there is a Pilgrim's Totem in a location that is off the official Camino Frances. I suspect every little town west of Portomarin has had some Pilgrims visit their town at some point in history. Perhaps there was some sort of sickness in let's say Arzua, so people used the next town over.This misrepresents my post. My point is that none of these organizations are in charge of the Camino. If any conceptual structure explains the Camino today, it is that its properties are emergent - greater than the sum its parts, none of which could be removed without taking away more than its individual contribution. Amazingly for many, while it might have started with a single, motivated, individual, this has continued through collaboration, participation and collective coordination of the various parties.
Actually, it's a whole bunch of different entities, often acting without coordination and sometimes at cross purposes.There's really no one in charge of the Camino in Galicia? How did the 100 km rule come into existance? When I hiked the camino there was a work crew of people with weedwackers/brushcutters working on the hedgerows of the camino. Who is paying them? At some point everything about the camino has been decided by some group or entity. So, whoever they are, they should consider this. I think it would be great for the Camino
For what it's worth, my IGN map of the Camino, circa 1989, seems to show the Camino going through Vilar de Donas, but it also might be just south. (I also just noticed that the thick green line that marks the Camino continues past Santiago, but not to Finisterre, instead to Padron.)Good question. I walked the CF in 2010 and again in 2016. The route that I took both times followed the road from Airexe to A Brea, some 2 km south of Vilar de Donas. The current CF route alignment hasn't changed from that, so any change wasn't recent.
I'm not sure how a route through Vilar de Donas would work coming from Portomarin. Just looking at the OSM mapping on the web, there doesn't appear to be any existing road or track network that would make it a more direct route to Melide than the current alignment. Do you have any information on the routing that might have existed to include this on the CF route?
If only it were that easy. There's plenty of bureaucracy and red tape in the US. There's a group in Los Angeles who isn't waiting for the powers that be to paint crosswalks at some critical intersections and has been doing it themselves. Unfortunately, when the authorities discover these citizen created crosswalks they paint over them.
I do not know if you are a new world person but I doubt it.The New World Method: Build it and they will come.
I disagree. Saying they should implement it takes it beyond a suggestion. Saying they should consider it doesn't presuppose what they should do as a result.Stating that other people should consider this, is not a suggestion.
It comes across as a rather arrogant statement.
Very good point. I should have pulled that off the shelf first.Pretty hard to tell on that scale. The 1985 Valiña guide has the Camino passing a little south of Vilar de Donas.
View attachment 146290
There are dozens of old churches and villages to the right and left of the trail with the yellow arrows where pilgrims could walk tomorrow and where pilgrims may have walked at any point in time. You can walk any way you want to Santiago and regard it as a hike or a pilgrimage or whatever you want to call it. Nobody will stop you. So what is your point? You want to have more infrastructure than there is, worldwide PR, recognition so that walkers get a Compostela? You may have more success with your suggestions being heard by “them” when you try to understand what “their” criteria are for making such financial investments and other efforts. Good luck!. It's already been reported that there is a Pilgrim's Totem in a location that is off the official Camino Frances. I suspect every little town west of Portomarin has had some Pilgrims visit there town at some point in history. Perhaps there was some sort of sickness in let's say Arzua, so people used the next town over.
There are actually lots of alternative routes, but not a complete one to Santiago. But lots of varientes.There are already several alternative routes on the Camino Frances,
but perhaps the place they could use one the most doesn't have one.
I think the people of Galicia should consider creating an alternative route
after Portomarin. Perhaps having the alternative go through Monterroso.
The reason the variant has to be after Portomarin is that bridges over
the River Mino are few and far between.
One can always stop on the Camino Frances at Sarria, and travel to Monforte de Lemos on the Camino de Invierno. IIRC, the distance from Monforte de Lemos to Santiago, along the Camino de Invierno is 134 km or thereabouts.
Essentially, you trade one more walking day for an almost total lack of crowds. Were I walking the Camino Frances during the peak season, I would seriously consider this detour.
In fact, I just checked Rome2Rio.com. There are multiple trains, and buses, everyday, from Sarria to Monforte de Lemos.
The trip takes 31 - 40 minutes. Buses are cheapest. Trains are more comfortable and, at least to me, convenient.
In comparison, there are fewer support services along the Invierno - largely because there are so few pilgrims along most of the route.
Hope this helps,
Tom
The Camino is not the Rainbow Gathering. The Camino has people and groups making decisions about it. Yes, there may be many factions deciding stuff, but they are deciding it. Meanwhile, the Rainbow People and Gathering have intentionally no leader or nobody in charge of anything. That way when they make an encampment in the National Forest, nobody can be sued. Maybe, we could solve the Camino problem by going back and not having ANY official routes. Just let people hike to Santiago the way they see fit. It's already been reported that there is a Pilgrim's Totem in a location that is off the official Camino Frances. I suspect every little town west of Portomarin has had some Pilgrims visit there town at some point in history. Perhaps there was some sort of sickness in let's say Arzua, so people used the next town over.
This has been happening for years as far as I can tell. There have always been accommodation options off what might be the narrowly defined 'formal camino'. Sometimes owners will pick up pilgrims and drop them back to where they were collected the following day, others one might walk or use a taxi. This happens on other pilgrimage routes and in other countries. I have done it myself in both Spain and elsewhere. It doesn't have to be because there is no available accommodation either, although that might be one of the circumstances where it does happen. You would have to contemplate that pilgrims might make personal choices to use a place, others might recommend somewhere they stayed on previous pilgrimages, etc.Let's say a pilgrim is hiking the Camino and the Camino
is totally jammed with people. Let's say that pilgrim looks at booking.com
and sees there is a bed available in the next town over, which is 7 km from
the Camino. So the pilgrim walks over there and skips a section of the
Official Camino. Is the Pilgrims Office going to accept that pilgrim's credential?
I think this phrase is the key to the problem. The 'people of Galicia' are a very heterogeneous lot. First there is the Xunta, the elected government or council of the Autonomous region of Galicia who would be responsible for building albergues and marking the route and who would have to find the budget for same. Elected bodies are powerfully opposed to anything that requires a budget. Then there are the local conselhos or town councils, some of whom would be happy to have a new camino route passing through their town, assuming it did pass through their town because if it didn't they'd be lobbying for it to do so rather than passing through another town a couple of kilometres away. Other local councils will be dominated by farmers and land owners, bitterly opposed to troupes of foreigners marching across their fields. Then there are local historians with conflicting claims about whether a particular church or village was ever on a pilgrimage route. Some local people are simply opposed to caminos on ideological or personal grounds. You would need to enlist the support of local confederations to mark and maintain the route and finally you would have to convince the Roman Catholic Church that what you have is an authentic, traditional pilgrimage route (and let's not get started on UNESCO and the Spanish government in Madrid). Even the Camino Francés took years of cajoling, negotiating and sheer hard work just to establish what we now accept as a well-worn and universally recognised route, and new routes have proven extremely difficult to set up - witness Ender´s efforts on the Salvador and Olvidado. It´s a great idea on the face of it, but it´s never going to happen just because it´s a great idea: it's going to require years of commitment, research and often very hard work.the people of Galicia
Probably. In the early days of the Camino revival in the 1980s before the 100km rule Sarria had no special significance. Although there was no minimum distance for a Compostela most people then chose to walk far longer distances than the current 100km minimum. @Kathar1na found some fascinating statistics from Roncesvalles from 1987 which showed that half of all Compostelas that year went to people who had passed through Roncesvalles. These days only a small fraction of pilgrims walk anything like that distance and most opt for something close to the minimum necessary to receive the Compostela.Are we laying the blame for the log jam on the 100k requirement ?
Do these places need to be organised as a formal route. Clearly not. I suggest that the current arrangements are at least adequate. Could it be improved? Most things can, but that doesn't mean that some gringo should step in and interfere.
There is nothing wrong with the Camino. There is nothing needs fixing.make the camino a better experience.
Now I am Gringo who is interfering when I am just making a suggestion to make the camino a better experience.
That there is nothing wrong with the Camino or that needs fixing doesn't make it necessarily follow that it cannot be a better experience. That's why people build and supply and maintain the many donativos that we encounter along the way. I wouldn't say that their efforts are wasted.There is nothing wrong with the Camino. There is nothing needs fixing.
Now the expectations and demands of some of the people walking the trails…. There’s something that could do with a bit of work.
There is nothing wrong with the Camino. There is nothing needs fixing.
Now the expectations and demands of some of the people walking the trails…. There’s something that could do with a bit of work.
The strong defensive reaction to a suggestion for "improvement" seems like an unkind over-reaction to me. I think there are challenges and even flaws in the suggestion, but the idea should not be slammed down with such energy. Of course there are ways to improve our experiences, as @David Tallan points out.That there is nothing wrong with the Camino or that needs fixing doesn't make it necessarily follow that it cannot be a better experience. That's why people build and supply and maintain the many donativos that we encounter along the way. I wouldn't say that their efforts are wasted.
Good one.There is nothing wrong with the Camino. There is nothing needs fixing.
Now the expectations and demands of some of the people walking the trails…. There’s something that could do with a bit of work.
perhaps the place they could use one the most doesn't have one.
I'm probably not going to do the Camino Frances again for a while unless Greybeard wants to do it. I'm trying to get him to do it in 24 as a warm up to his potentially record breaking hike of the Appalachian Trail in 25. He already has the record for the oldest person to paddle the Mississippi River, which I helped him out with last year. In reality, you could hike off the Camino Frances for most of the day as long as you get your two stamps on the camino each day.So, @isawtman, be adventurous and create your own route from Portomarin and let the rest of us know how it worked out.
And kia kaha, kia māia, kia mana'wa'nui (take care, be strong, confident and patient).
I take it that this is a reference to Dale Sanders. He must be a fascinating man. The first online article I found about his recent record breaking attempt stated thatI'm probably not going to do the Camino Frances again for a while unless Greybeard wants to do it. I'm trying to get him to do it in 24 as a warm up to his potentially record breaking hike of the Appalachian Trail in 25
andHis thirst for adventure was never quenched as it continued to grow into his 20s when he decided to enlist in the U.S. Navy in 1958. He spent the next 37 years as a Hospital Corpsman, a Hard Hat Deep Sea Diver and serving with the U.S. Marine Corps in Okinawa, Japan, where he was put in charge of the Third Marine Division sport diving program.
Both quotes from: https://www.inforum.com/news/minnes...-man-paddles-the-mississippi-river-once-again.He didn't stop there as he went into his professional career in Parks and Recreation for nearly six decades until retiring in 2002 to be a full-time adventurer.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?