D
Remove ads on the forum by becoming a donating member. More here. |
---|
The fundamental difference is that one activity is on public property and the other activity takes place on church property.So what is the fundamental difference between these two Catholic religious events?
@C clearlyThe fundamental difference is that one activity is on public property and the other activity takes place on church property.
I am not suggesting that my distinction solves all the practical issues related to application of the relevant laws. But I do think there is a "fundamental difference" in the comparison made in the OP (cathedral behaviour vs. camino behaviour). It is a very important difference in how rules and standards might be made and enforced/applied.@C clearly
This sounds logical but is not necessarily so. A family in small town Alberta was tormented by pokemon seekers after a part of their property was made into a pokemon gym, resulting in trespassers, their dogs barking all night, and I believe some minor property damage. Their requests to the makers of pokemon to remove their property from the program were ignored until they took their problem to the CBC. I have no doubt that this is happening wherever pokemon is active (Where isn't it?).
Cultivate your own garden.
Except for physically destructive conduct, cause and effect will cure it all. The activity between an individual's ears in response to conduct is just something each person will have to deal with. The Camino is there to help each of us understand that.
In the meantime, pick up a few pieces of litter. It will make you feel just a little bit superior to those who don't.
Thanks for your input, I appreciate it. Would it be correct to paraphrase that location or at least ownership of location is the criteria upon what is acceptable in this example? I would agree that what happens on public land is certainly have an influence. I wonder if a person voluntarily walking a Catholic pilgrimage on public land but choosing to carry a credential issued by the church (or Camino organization) and reap the benefits of it should be held to any different set of rules or standards? Thanks again for your thoughts.The fundamental difference is that one activity is on public property and the other activity takes place on church property.
Not at all! That is not a paraphrase of my post!Would it be correct to paraphrase that location or at least ownership of location is the criteria upon what is acceptable in this example?
Thanks for your input. I too grew up with that ideal and it has often been a guide for me. For the last two years I've lived in an African country where beliefs and cultures are at times fully 180 degrees away from what I have known for my whole life. I only mention that because 'do unto others...' doesn't work for me as it once did because others don't always want to be treated as I do and vice versa. So I guess my follow-up question would be how we deal with situations when two people want opposite things (eg Pokemon vs Non-PokemonThe fundamental rule as ever is: "One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself".
My apologies if I've misunderstood or offended. It wasn't my intention. Perhaps I'll resist the need to understand others posts as it seems I'm not very good at itNot at all! That is not a paraphrase of my post!
I was not addressing acceptability of behaviour, or even what rules I would want to impose if I had that ability. I was pointing out that there is a fundamental difference in the way "rules and standards" could and would be set in those two events (church service vs walking outside). I support the right of the church to set whatever rules it wants, within its jurisdiction, and that includes the issuance of credencials and compostelas.
Excellent post and conclusion!The Camino is intended to be an invitation to all equally to experience forgiveness, newness, and to begin anew. Nothing could be more egalitarian.
Yes, yes and yes. Rules are made by all three of these organisations, and perhaps many more. In most cases we walk within those rules without, I suspect, giving them all that much thought. Most of us won't set out to break the Spanish law, and if we wish to receive the compostela, we will comply with the rules set by the Santiago Cathedral about the minimum walking distance and number of sellos. I could go on, but I would observe that most organisations who have the power to make rules that might apply to pilgrims do not seem to want to interfere any more than is necessary.who would make the rules? Spanish government, Catholic church? local towns?
Once someone starts making rules it will take away the freedom the the Camino offers and why many of people seek it out. Who's to say they wouldn't make a rule of how far you must walk each day or how how many days have to finish in.
It is best just left as is, with the existing loose set of rules both written and unwritten, and let the Camino police itself.
That doesn't, IMO, mean that the standard-free "it's your Camino" mantra is there for us all to hide beneath to justify whatever behavior best suits our self-indulgent pampering.
Thanks, @falcon269--this one of my favorite posts in a long time. And I think I need to start by picking up more trash.Cultivate your own garden.
Except for physically destructive conduct, cause and effect will cure it all. The activity between an individual's ears in response to conduct is just something each person will have to deal with. The Camino is there to help each of us understand that.
In the meantime, pick up a few pieces of litter. It will make you feel just a little bit superior to those who don't.
To apply a different lens: The difference between playing Pokemon Go on the Camino and playing in church is the difference in disruption or intrusion on the activities of others.So what is the fundamental difference between these two ... events?
Or one might think of it being catholic in the other English meaning of the word - including a wide variety of things; all-embracing, or universal.I think the description of the present day Camino as a "Catholic Pilgrimage" is a large overreach.
Thanks for your input. I too grew up with that ideal and it has often been a guide for me. For the last two years I've lived in an African country where beliefs and cultures are at times fully 180 degrees away from what I have known for my whole life. I only mention that because 'do unto others...' doesn't work for me as it once did because others don't always want to be treated as I do and vice versa.
Thanks for your input. I too grew up with that ideal and it has often been a guide for me. For the last two years I've lived in an African country where beliefs and cultures are at times fully 180 degrees away from what I have known for my whole life. I only mention that because 'do unto others...' doesn't work for me as it once did because others don't always want to be treated as I do and vice versa. So I guess my follow-up question would be how we deal with situations when two people want opposite things (eg Pokemon vs Non-Pokemon)? Maybe as easy as turning the other cheek but I've read many posts on this forum and have seen some very passionate discussions about this and it seems a very hard issue to find a compromise at times.
And may I add the concept of common sense. I believe that most things can be solved , even if we come from very different cultural backgrounds , if we use our common sense.
And just treat people like you yourself would like to be treated.
But yes it is an interesting topic the OP puts here. The line between individualism versus being part of a community : " The I or the WE ".
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Met modern Druids walking it as it really was their Pilgrimage first.
It comes from modern guidebooks and blogs. Don't try to fight it, it is a lost battle.Seriously, where does that statement come from? I keep asking for evidence and would be most interested if someone could come up with it!
But you know that the credencial in its present form, with boxes for sellos to document one's path, is a modern invention, dating from the middle of the 1980s. And that is was originally designed by Friends of the Ways of St James organisations and not by the Church. And as a recent discussion revealed, there are credencials, officially recognised by the Church, that contain a reference to a (prescribed) Christian element of the pilgrimage while others make no mention of it at all, and if I understand correctly what a volunteer from the Santiago pilgrim's welcome office reported, none of this really matters much to the Church in the sense that a Christian attitude, or vaguely searching for such an attitude, is encouraged and welcomed but not prescribed? So, there are no Church rules for the pilgrimage as such.there is also the credencial. While on some routes anyone can stay in albergues, in many albergues one must still have a Credencial to be able to stay there. This to me is a way the Camino is a Church thing, and not just a GR. In that respect, Jozero poses an interesting question.
As a starting point for me, I certainly keep thinking about this Pokemon idea. I'm all for people being able to live as they choose and experience the Camino in their own way. So on that I think Pokemon is fine, just another group enjoying their life in a way that makes them happy
Catholic Pilgrimage? I would never have thought that when I walked in 2014. While I am catholic, I walked it to purposely place my Dog tags , worn in Combat in Cambodia, Laos, & Viet Nam, at the old Roman Army shrine known as the Cross of Iron. Met UFO fanatics who claim that Santiago is where the first UFO landed on earth. Met modern Druids walking it as it really was their Pilgrimage first.
I think that, instead of additional hard-and-fast rules, the answer is to promote a 'pilgrim ethic', with principles that help people best experience the pilgrimage.
For example, "pilgrims shouldn't use smartphones and iPads" is a (dogmatic and impractical) rule. However, "a 'pilgrim should try to minimize thier reliance on internet connectedness and experience more solitude and personal interaction" is (arguably) a valuable principle that might help someone.
p.s. the Golden Rule is really a Golden principle and should definitely be on the list
p.p.s Yes, Pokemon is an issue at churches, too. Even my dedicated youth ministry teens have been seen catching Pokemon on the grounds...we just had to remind them to keep it out of the church itself and to keep it respectful and courteous to God and others.
Nothing, Annie, nothing at all. And I personally think Pokemon's 'enhanced reality' is actually 'diminished reality.'what's wrong with just walking and experiencing what "nature" has to offer ... experiencing the stillness of the land .... meeting other soulful people .... sharing experiences ....I am not religious BUT perhaps even hear the voice of the creator in the wind, rain, shadows ??? How can life be better than this ???
IMHO the pokemeon players shall miss all this .......
Probably.Am I getting old ????
But you know that the credencial in its present form, with boxes for sellos to document one's path, is a modern invention, dating from the middle of the 1980s.
... there are credencials, officially recognised by the Church, that contain a reference to a (prescribed) Christian element of the pilgrimage while others make no mention of it at all,
and if I understand correctly what a volunteer from the Santiago pilgrim's welcome office reported, none of this really matters much to the Church in the sense that a Christian attitude, or vaguely searching for such an attitude, is encouraged and welcomed but not prescribed? So, there are no Church rules for the pilgrimage as such.
As to the albergues: is Roncesvalles a Christian albergue for example? Not too long ago, it was run by the Roncesvalles monks but now it is run by Dutch volunteers.
I don't understand this. I have been checking for albergue accommodation for my upcoming camino. Some private albergues state on gronze.com that they are not limiting their accommodation to pilgrims with credenciales, but they will admit pilgrims. It seems that the owner or manager of a private albergue decides whether or not to admit pilgrims, not that they are somehow only permitted to accept pilgrims.And it's those same credenciales that are required to stay in the majority of albergues. I don't understand the logic. A document sanctionned by the cathedral is needed to get inexpensive lodging in private albergues. Why?
How might the secular strollers evidence their walking? Or are you supposing that they'll be excluded from Public and parochial Albergues but admitted to the commercial ones even if they've arrived by car? In much the way that the YHA operates these days. Calling in to the Albergue in Burgos I mentioned to the hospitalero that I was walking to Moratinos to join the Ditch Pigs. I was very firmly informed that the Albrergue was for pilgrims walking to Santiago.let's do without stamps and booklets for those who are on a "secular walk".
It comes from modern guidebooks and blogs. Don't try to fight it, it is a lost battle..
I don't understand this. I have been checking for albergue accommodation for my upcoming camino. Some private albergues state on gronze.com that they are not limiting their accommodation to pilgrims with credenciales, but they will admit pilgrims. It seems that the owner or manager of a private albergue decides whether or not to admit pilgrims, not that they are somehow only permitted to accept pilgrims.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?