Royal Pantheon, Nájera.

You always find such intriguing historical questions @Bert45 !

I am ignorant to the history but appreciate trying to learn more. I wonder if "clara" was an adjective, not her proper name. She had also been the wife of two previous kings (of Leon) who died, so maybe her name was disambiguated to be "clearly" the queen of Sancho II?

Here is a source for you to dig into; if you do a search for "clara" you will find references to Queen Urraca, wife of King Sancho II, which are copied below.


a) Titulatio:
"Ego humilis et seruus seruorum omnium Domini ultimus et tamen gratia Dei,
Sanctius rex et Ranemirus rex, seu cum clara Urraka regina (...)"
("yo, humilde y último siervo de todos los siervos del Señor, y sin embargo, por la
gracia de Dios, Sancho el rey, y también el rey Ramiro, y asimismo con la clara
reina Urraca,...")

Subscriptio:
"(...) regnante (...) Sanctione rex in Nagela et in Pampilona, et sub eius imperio
parendo rex Ranemirus in Uekaria (...) Sanctius serenissimus rex, cum prolis
Garseani, hunc testamentum manu propia confirmans (signum); Ranemirus
frater ipsius regis confirmans; domna Urraka clara regina confirmans (...)"
("reinante...Sancho rey en Nájera y en Pamplona, y bajo la dependencia del
imperio de éste el rey Ramiro en Viguera...Sancho, rey serenísimo, con su hijo
García, confirmando este testamento con su propia mano; Ramiro, hermano de ese
rey, confirmándolo; doña Urraca, clara reina, confirmándolo..."

lalaone said:

I wonder if "clara" was an adjective

Click to expand...

https://www.estudiogeneraldehumanidades.es/estudios-riojanos/pdfs/viguera-4/4_Orden-cronologico.pdf

Click to expand...

@lalaone, look at the lines of the transcription from the document dated 14 July 972 as well as the comment that follows: Inclita domna Urraca which the author translates as contemporary Spanish ilustre. He even draws the reader's attention to it, saying that en otros diplomas de documentos de otras procedencias se le adjudican epítetos similares. This is 10th century Latin vocabulary and style. The "label" on the sepulchre is 16th century Spanish and style. Those who designed the label may have had access to 10th century originals and taken interpretation and inspiration from them or, more likely, they may have relied on later chronicles and all that this brings with it.

Bert45 said:

why. in all the scholarly posts on the internet, does nobody call her Clara?

Click to expand...

for the same reason that nobody calls J.Robert Oppenheimer Jules
I worked with plenty of people who do not like to be called by their 1st name and use their middle for most of the time (I have a distant cousin whose name was Janet and she did not like that or her middle name so she decided to go by Net)
I think another reasonably good example would be one Princess Sophie Augusta Frederica von Anhalt-Zerbst who was known as Fricke

Another possibility is the consort of this king:

Sancho García IV of Peñalen (1054-1076).
At the age of 14 he was proclaimed King in the same field of Atapuerca, where his father died, receiving the kingdom of Navarre relegated to its former borders. He was an excellent King who was called The Noble. He married Doña Placencia, Clara or Blanca de Normandía.

That was from this webpage:


The epithets Clara or Blanca may mean pure. See:

THE QUEENS OF ARAGON
THEIR LIVES AND TIMES
BY E. L. MIRON

The name Urraca, of pure Arabic meaning, signifying "brilliant in colour," was a common one in Castile,
So Clara or Blanca can make sense applied to the name Urraca.

Inclita domna Urraca

Click to expand...

@lalaone, I've gone through the other relevant transcriptions in the linked document.

So we have clara Urraka regina; domna Urraka clara regina; regina Urraca preclara; and inclita domna Urraca. These are all found in 10th century documents. They are not narratives about this queen but legal documents that she herself and the king himself and others signed, mostly with the dates of their signatures in the years between 970 and 980.

I can't see who the author is who put these transcriptions of documents from the 10th century together but he appears to understand his business. He describes these words as epitetos dedicated to the queen, i.e. descriptive terms, and they all mean more or less the same.

Bert45 said:

Assuming that this Urraca, wife of Sancho II is the one buried in the monastery, why. in all the scholarly posts on the internet, does nobody call her Clara?

Click to expand...

And if the inscription means her why is it there in Najera when her body is supposed to be elsewhere? See: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urraca_Fernández#Sepultura

BTW, a clearer photo of the Najera inscription is available here:
Enlarge to see the various ways the stone carver uses to save space and carving time. I particularly like the E inside the D (for de) and Rei (Rey) followed by an O within the D (to start Don).