- Time of past OR future Camino
- To Santiago and back. Le Puy to Aumont-Aubrac.
Remove ads on the forum by becoming a donating member. More here. |
---|
I guess it depends on what you mean by "Camino". We certainly know that human habitation in Spain goes back a very long time indeed. So the land was there and there were people there. Does that make a Camino? Of that I'm not so sure. I doubt very much that your Homo Neanderthalis dodging Mastodons was walking from the Pyrenees to the coast (or the spot some 90 km inland where Santiago is now to be found). He or she probably never left the Meseta. Would one thus say he was on the Camino?I have no doubt the Camino pre-dates Christianity by a considerable time. Homo Neanderthalis was probably dodging Mastodons on the Meseta.
On it, but not of it perhaps? And by the time they got to Atapuerca it had been a long walk (and a lot of personal development) since they left AfricaWould one thus say he was on the Camino?
I don't know. For me just being on the Meseta where the Camino would one day be doesn't put them on the Camino any more than being on the piece of land in the middle of Spain where Madrid would one day in the future be wouldn't put someone in Madrid.On it, but not of it perhaps? And by the time they got to Atapuerca it had been a long walk (and a lot of personal development) since they left Africa
Depends on whether you believe in ghostsI don't know. For me just being on the Meseta where the Camino would one day be doesn't put them on the Camino any more than being on the piece of land in the middle of Spain where Madrid would one day in the future be wouldn't put someone in Madrid.
Samten,Hello Fellow Pilgrims,
I am interested in researching the pagan origins of the Camino. Do you have any suggestions of resources and/or authors that I could look into? I don't have a clue where or how to begin.
Thanks so much and Buen Camino!
Just text to 666. All responses can be disregarded as mythical at bestWhere's the Spanish Inquisition now that we really need them? You never know when you need an Inquisitor. Is there a phone number we can call when we meet an unrepentant pagan pilgrim?
And "pagar" would be to walk from village to village, especially when done with a tour operator.I learnt in this thread that pagan comes from paganus the one who lives in a pagus ( a village, an area ). In Spanish the word " pago" is payment, but another meaning is the same as latin pagus. This meaning is today referred almost only to "vino de pago", that is an special denomination of high quality wines that only twenty wineries in Spain have. Some people in Spain think that a "vino de pago" is an "expensive wine" ( payment) because they don't know the second meaning.
And btw, @Gerard Griffin, a tiny history lesson for you - after all, you are posting in the Culture, History and Language for pilgrims subforum: The Inquisition did not persecute pagans. They persecuted heretics. BIG difference. I recommend Wikipedia for further reading.
The Spanish Inquisition mostly persecuted people they suspected as secretly being Jews or Muslims after the forced conversions. Other heretics, I believe, were a distant third place.And btw, @Gerard Griffin, a tiny history lesson for you - after all, you are posting in the Culture, History and Language for pilgrims subforum: The Inquisition did not persecute pagans. They persecuted heretics. BIG difference. I recommend Wikipedia for further reading.
The last "auto de fe" against witches was in 1610 in Zugarramurdi (Navarra). The famous Salem (Massachusetts) trial was in 1692.And btw, @Gerard Griffin, a tiny history lesson for you - after all, you are posting in the Culture, History and Language for pilgrims subforum: The Inquisition did not persecute pagans. They persecuted heretics. BIG difference. I recommend Wikipedia for further reading.
Yes, I remember that we discussed this some time ago. Really interesting. I think that whole protocols of interviewing "witnesses" such as servants or maids in the households of people who had voluntarily or under coercion converted from the Jewish faith to the Christian faith have been preserved.Jews, Food, and Spain by Hélène Jawhara Piñer. One of the main sources of our knowledge of medieval Sephardic food practices is records of the Inquisition when people were accused of secretly being Jewish based on the foods they prepared and ate.
I have no idea. I read that Spanish Inquisition had jurisdiction only over Christians. Therefore, only those who self-identified as Christians could be investigated and trialed by it. And also, that the King of Spain ordered that that the inquisitors should never proceed against the Indians (in the Spanish colonies) - at the time the only "pagans" in the Spanish empire.The Spanish Inquisition mostly persecuted people they suspected as secretly being Jews or Muslims after the forced conversions. Other heretics, I believe, were a distant third place.
Thanks for yours words, but the articles are 16 and the others more complet the history of finisterre and not in these serial. Searching!I got sidetracked ....
In any case, if I have not yet made it clear enough: I am less interested in what they would call "original research" or "own research" on Wikipedia which is not allowed there, at least in principle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research
What I am interested in are the actual historical sources, over centuries, that contain claims about anything that could be classified as a pilgrimage of some sort to the region around today's Santiago and how these authors contributed to the narratives that we hear today and that are often presented as facts while they are largely based on fiction when you actually look at the sources. I find that quite fascinating for more than one reason.
From this point of view, Juan Satti's twelve articles are a real treasure trove because he has compiled so many details about these sources, what they say in the original version and in a Spanish translation and in particular, unlike so many other contemporary articles, books and websites, he provides sufficient information (authors, titles of their books, etc) that makes it possible to find and access such sources directly. And with the World Wide Web being the marvellous tool that it is, these sources are now accessible to all of us who have an interest in this topic!
That last sentence reverberates with me as it forms one of the roots of my poetry in the thread Poems for Seekers.I saw this thread going sideways as soon as it was posted. I hope Tinca can bring back some sense and order to it.
Are we discussing "pagans" or are we researching "pre-historic" migrations?
There were immigration trails worldwide since creation and these immigrants/pilgrims followed certain stars or a constellation in the galaxy of stars to what they thought might be the end of the world. It always seems to be westward for some reason, perhaps to follow the sun? The Native Americans, the Basque, the Celts were all the same.
No one is going to reveal much because there is nothing to be revealed.,
Other than perhaps ancient mankind was seeking away to find a way back to the planet that deposited us here in the first place?
I guess that is a reaction to my comment: a tiny history lesson for you - after all, you are posting in the Culture, History and Language for pilgrims subforum: The Inquisition did not persecute pagans. They persecuted heretics. BIG difference. I recommend Wikipedia for further readingThanks for the history lesson, but I was of course using the word "pagan" in a looser, less technical sense, in order to look at the Camino experience of the many modern pilgrims who don't see their spirituality in Christian terms. Also, my suggestion that the redoubtable Inquisitors might become involved (no-one expects the Spanish Inquisition) was what we term a "joke", i.e. a remark not intended to be taken literally ... A concept with which those on the forum often seem unfamiliar.
@Gerard Griffin I would like to say this: literally? - hmm! How can we cope with that on a 'flat' forum? I am unfamiliar with a lot of nuances. Something I learned in a real space many many years ago was that humour isThanks for the history lesson, but I was of course using the word "pagan" in a looser, less technical sense, in order to look at the Camino experience of the many modern pilgrims who don't see their spirituality in Christian terms. Also, my suggestion that the redoubtable Inquisitors might become involved (no-one expects the Spanish Inquisition) was what we term a "joke", i.e. a remark not intended to be taken literally ... A concept with which those on the forum often seem unfamiliar.
Take it easy today. I will.Very true, Kirkie, it's all anthropological ... People from different cultures will always grate on each other's nerves, as the testiness of the preceding post indicates. Once it gets personal, that's when I abandon the discussion. It's a pity that the original idea: pagan motives for Camino ... Couldn't be pleasantly and cogently explored. The mysteries of the Germanic soul, if that's not a contradiction in terms.
Re-reading: pagan motives for Camino. What do you actually mean? The word camino means way, path.Very true, Kirkie, it's all anthropological ... People from different cultures will always grate on each other's nerves, as the testiness of the preceding post indicates. Once it gets personal, that's when I abandon the discussion. It's a pity that the original idea: pagan motives for Camino ... Couldn't be pleasantly and cogently explored. The mysteries of the Germanic soul, if that's not a contradiction in terms.
Sorry, I´m Juan G, Satti and I saw yesterday this forum. I´m so glad for your interest in my articles.I guess that is a reaction to my comment: a tiny history lesson for you - after all, you are posting in the Culture, History and Language for pilgrims subforum: The Inquisition did not persecute pagans. They persecuted heretics. BIG difference. I recommend Wikipedia for further reading?
A comment which I see I ended with my poker face icon.
Let me start with a big. I love Monty Python, I enjoy funny remarks, whether absurdly witty, or erudite witty, or silly witty, or a clever pun, or just a good joke. "Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition" is of course such an old joke that it has already gotten a long beard. Posted to death one might be tempted to say. I thought it was funny to turn it into an opportunity for a bit of further education. Anyway, what I don't enjoy so much are funny joke remarks (i.e. funny in the mind of the writer) that are plastered indiscriminately just anywhere in any thread where there is an empty space to be filled with typing and a "post reply" button to press. I cannot say whether I am the only forum member with such a reaction, there may be one or two others.
This is an old thread that has been dormant for more than half a year and I don't know why it surfaced yesterday nor do I quite understand content and purpose of yesterday's comment by @juanxxiii. He is apparently a new member, so welcome to the forum.
It is a Christian pilgrimage to a Christian shrine. Not sure what in this fact is hard to comprehend.I really do not understand the purposes of Catholic Church trying to "christianize" every place from antiques religions. The religions overlap like layers of an onion
And I, a self-identifying pagan from generations in recollection of self-identifying pagan, with firm belief in our collection of old Gods and old ways - I sometimes get seriously pissed off that every aethiestic, agnostic and “can’t be arsed” gets classed as a pagan. Or worse still tries to wear our Tshirt.
Problem with this is, then we're discussing religion rather than History ...This brings up the obvious next stage of a camino discussion, who are the real pagans. ; )
It is a Christian pilgrimage to a Christian shrine, ACTUALLY . But the "pagan" origin `cause other pilgrims walked first and marked the path. Like the Romans made the viarium , our streets of today. Not sure what in this fact is hard to comprehend.It is a Christian pilgrimage to a Christian shrine. Not sure what in this fact is hard to comprehend.
Humanity history include the religions- The problem is believe that Truly religion is chistianism and the others RELIGIONS are "myths"Problem with this is, then we're discussing religion rather than History ...
There was no such place as Santiago de Compostela in pagan times.It is a Christian pilgrimage to a Christian shrine, ACTUALLY . But the "pagan" origin `cause other pilgrims walked first and marked the path. Like the Romans made the viarium , our streets of today. Not sure what in this fact is hard to comprehend.
I really do not understand the purposes of Catholic Church trying to "christianize" every place from antiques religions. The religions overlap like layers of an onion
sorry i´m in europe: is PM ;DImmensely interesting to talk about Juan but take into consideration that one of the forumrules is that you cannot get too deep into discussing religion here.
It will end that people get into a tantrum and throw their toys out of the pram, start crying or get into endless discussions about the origins of the Christmas tree or the Transubstantiation.
Better to make some conversations through pm.
sorry i´m in europe: is PM ;D
exactly, the true pilgrimage is to Finisterre, end to road, The catholic way is a fake completely anachronistic: you're rightThere was no such place as Santiago de Compostela in pagan times.
It did not exist, therefore there was no "pagan" "pilgrimage" to that place.
The entire notion is completely anachronistic.
No it isn't.exactly, the true pilgrimage is to Finisterre
Exactly.But I cannot find evidences that there was a pagan pilgrimage before the Camino de Santiago. However the current pilgrimage has begun not before the VIIIe century: if some other pilgrimage has existed there, the History should have kept memory of it. Perhaps there was an ancient cult of stones in Muxia, but it was local.
I think that St James Way has begun for political reason: against the Moors and in order for Compostela to take precedence on Tolede church (which was the main church in Wisigothic Spain)
The way to St James from Pyrenees (Camino Frances) follow a previous roman way, the via Trajana, but it was an economical itinerary, not a religious one.
The true pilgrimage is to where? How can the pilgrimage to the bones of Santiago be to Finisterre? The bones of Santiago do not rest at Finisterre. They never have and they likely never will. @juanxxiii i think you are trying to cross hobble two traditions as if they were ever or ever could be one.Iexactly, the true pilgrimage is to Finisterre, end to road, The catholic way is a fake completely anachronistic: you're right(read my explications in my articles. santiago is a city without beach, and the pilgrims' shell????
Have a good day
Be very careful with "facts" provided by local turismos. They propagate the most spectacular moonshine imaginable.Fascinating! Thank you for the facts. Here is a narrative from the local turismo and a picture of the castro foundations. There is also the El Rocio in Andalusia, and I learned last year that there is also a local Spring romeria honoring The Lady in Roncesvalles.
“O Facho Mount is located at an altitude of 184 metres, in Costa da Vela. It takes its name from the look-out post erected on its summit. The archaeological interventions established that the first human settlement goes back to the Bronze Age (9th century B.C.E.). A fort and pre-Roman sanctuary was built in the 4th century B.C.E., which remained intact until the 1st century B.C.E. and whose ruins are still preserved. In the 3rdand 4th centuries, a Galician-Roman sanctuary was erected in order to cater to the ancient beliefs. Later on, in the 17th century, a military lookout was built atop of the mount. Throughout the centuries, Monte do Facho was home to many different life expressions, and all of them are part of Galician history. In addition, the top of the mount boasts glorious panoramic views of the Cíes Islands, the cliffs, and the rías.”
I am a pagan pilgrim! and I knows what I is and what I believes.... (yes - I is from Devon...)Debating the meaning of 'pagan'! Makes a very pleasant change from debating the meaning of 'pilgrim'.
I agree, some of it is quite amusing.I am a pagan pilgrim! and I knows what I is and what I believes.... (yes - I is from Devon...) But tis fun to read all the debating.....
Now that is definitely a topic for another thread. Maybe the Mods will oblige.How about the Christian origin of the Ways of Saint James, Saint Peter, and Saint Mary at Lourdes and Fátima ?
And countless other pilgrimage destinations throughout Europe ?
Do not forget than long before christianism, judaism has lead believers to Jerusalem: there was a single Temple for jews, and it was in Jerusalem. Several times a year, practicing jews were going to Jerusalem (most probably walking) for religious festivals.What occurs to me is the question of where did those early and later middle-ages pilgrims get the idea of pilgrimage from?
The original pilgrimage to Jerusalem was clearly Jewish, and as to "Faith is all you need", it is a late 20th - early 21st Century notion of pilgrimage anachronistic with Antiquity.What occurs to me is the question of where did those early and later middle-ages pilgrims get the idea of pilgrimage from? If Faith is all you need why would you decide to walk all the way to Jerusalem?
Are you testing us and our knowledgeWhat occurs to me is the question of where did those early and later middle-ages pilgrims get the idea of pilgrimage from? If Faith is all you need why would you decide to walk all the way to Jerusalem?
I’ve never, consciously, tried to shove my beliefs in anywhere. I think I fairly firmly stated around about #2 in this very enjoyable thread that there is absolutely no argument, let alone evidence, for any pre-christian or any archaic pilgrimage to Santiago. There’s no, or at least very little, evidence of any pre-christian or archaic pilgrimage to Fisterra, Muxia, Roman Finis Terre or anywhere else on this poor benighted planet.The original pilgrimage to Jerusalem was clearly Jewish, and as to "Faith is all you need", it is a late 20th - early 21st Century notion of pilgrimage anachronistic with Antiquity.
Regardless, Jewish pilgrimages to Jerusalem 2,500 + years ago were by by definition not "pagan". I'm quite dubious of this modern trend of shoving "paganism" into everything, including especially where it does not belong.
I have not claimed you were doing so, I talked in an impersonal manner of a "modern trend" by some third parties -- just clarifying, if that helps.I’ve never, consciously, tried to shove my beliefs in anywhere.
there is absolutely no argument, let alone evidence, for any pre-christian or any archaic pilgrimage to Santiago. There’s no, or at least very little, evidence of any pre-christian or archaic pilgrimage to Fisterra, Muxia, Roman Finis Terre or anywhere else on this poor benighted planet.
Now I'm genuinely confused.And petulant rejection of the topic gets us no further than “nothing to see here, move along, move along”.
Yes.But, surely, a deep dive into the origins of pilgrimage and, perhaps, our perceptions of pilgrimage is worthwhile.
Greetings Samten! I am a witch and my co-podcaster and I have been researching the pagan/preChristian/native practices the preceded the Christian Camino. My copodcaster is a researcher and a professor. I am a high school English teacher with a masters degree is Spiritual Psychology. We both have been practicing witches for decades so we bring different experiences to the table both personally as well as professionally. We have been researching this for about a year now and are starting to organize the information. We would love to share this information with you!Hello Fellow Pilgrims,
I am interested in researching the pagan origins of the Camino. Do you have any suggestions of resources and/or authors that I could look into? I don't have a clue where or how to begin.
Thanks so much and Buen Camino!
Please share!Hello
Greetings Samten! I am a witch and my co-podcaster and I have been researching the pagan/preChristian/native practices the preceded the Christian Camino. My copodcaster is a researcher and a professor. I am a high school English teacher with a masters degree is Spiritual Psychology. We both have been practicing witches for decades so we bring different experiences to the table both personally as well as professionally. We have been researching this for about a year now and are starting to organize the information. We would love to share this information with you!
Worth putting Cruz Ferro into the forum search engine for some good discussion down the days. The Hermes, Mercury attribution has had a fairly good thrashing, as has the suggestion it was Galician peasants on their way to the Meseta for the grain harvest. There are no comfirmative historical records yet discovered but there is lots of “it is said”.Having only scanned the comments I'm not sure if anyone brought up the "pre-christian" origin of Cruz de Ferro yet? Correct me if I am wrong, but I have read in a few places that the tradition dates back to travelers tossing a stone at what may have been just a cairn to a shrine to Hermes. This was done for safe travel, being he was the god of such. Anyone have anymore pieces of this origin story? Thanks in advance!
Fair enough! Thanks Tincattinker! (Heading there now!)Worth putting Cruz Ferro into the forum search engine for some good discussion down the days. The Hermes, Mercury attribution has had a fairly good thrashing, as has the suggestion it was Galician peasants on their way to the Meseta for the grain harvest. There are no comfirmative historical records yet discovered but there is lots of “it is said”.
Hi Tincatinker!Please share!
Hi @skysurf you’ve not got PM privileges yet. Need to have made more than 5 posts I believe.Hi Tincatinker!
I tried to send you a private message, but I didn't find how to do it. Sorry for sending this question in a public post.
I read in other of your posts that you knew of evidence of human remains or vessels in Galicia that are geographically as far away as the Danube River basin. Could you tell me a little more about this? Or could you send me the link to the post where you had already explained it? Thank you very much!
Thanks!!Hi @skysurf you’ve not got PM privileges yet. Need to have made more than 5 posts I believe.
Meanwhile, at post 14 in this very thread you’ll find a link to some interesting stuff. Just remember where Alice ended up
This is super interesting! This reinforces the idea that caminos were used to transport sacred items.OK, a departure but linked: just what were they up to in the Neolithic? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c207lqdn755o
Apologies in advance to those who won’t be able to access the BBC link but it provides evidence that one of the crucial stones that form part of the Stonehenge complex was fetched from north- east Scotland. I’ll bet Amazon couldn’t deliver
Some facts:Early Christians used the term "pagan" in the fourth century to describe the polytheists of earlier times. Latitude and longitude stumbled to life as early as the 12th century BCE, but needed the Earth to be round rather than flat to advance the science of navigation. I was taught that Columbus was afraid of falling off the edge of the world in 1492. He didn't.
Only imagination can limit what Pagans may have thought of long walks to spiritual destinations. I suspect imaginations require only faith, not science or proof. I do know that Pagans did not have Lambert Conformal Conic Projections to align stars and land, so maybe they just liked to wander and backfit the reasons for that preference over the evening campfire.
"Likely because roads were the ways through which items, such as ceramics that were baked or forged, were transported"Is very interesting that the word "camino" comes from the Latin caminus, which originally meant "furnace" or "forge," referring to a place where fire was kindled or to an oven. This term is also related to the Greek word kaminos (κάμινος), which also referred to an oven.
Likely because roads were the ways through which items, such as ceramics that were baked or forged, were transported.
LOL, I just had a Déja Vu experience: news media article versus science journal articleOK, a departure but linked: just what were they up to in the Neolithic? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c207lqdn755o
Apologies in advance to those who won’t be able to access the BBC link but it provides evidence that one of the crucial stones that form part of the Stonehenge complex was fetched from north- east Scotland. I’ll bet Amazon couldn’t deliver
This is why we have a subforum about "Culture, History & Language". It allows those forum members who do not care about the origins or history to skip the threads in this subforum. No obligation to read let alone participate in these threads.I just like to walk and go to new places. And the people I meet. I like the people because typically they are kind, forgiving, charitable, and interesting. Personally I have no affiliation with any organized social institutions. But I do believe in the inherent goodness of the soul, mostly. I find that the proportion of those you meet on a walk to Santiago don't necessarily have better standards or anything than the general population, but they do have a will. I don't care about the origins or history. Just my own perspective.
OK. Fair.This is why we have a subforum about "Culture, History & Language". It allows those forum members who do not care about the origins or history to skip the threads in this subforum. No obligation to read let alone participate in these threads.
"Likely because roads were the ways through which items, such as ceramics that were baked or forged, were transported"? Are you serious or are you trolling us?
You may want to check your etymology again. While I am not a trained etymologist I can read and all I can read from no-nonsense sources says to me that the contemporary Spanish word camino does not come from Latin caminus. If it can be traced to a Latin word it's Late Latin/Early Medieval Latin and it's camminus. No fire or oven involved let alone baked clay.
The term pagan originated from the Latin word paganus, which originally meant "country dweller" or "rustic." It was used to describe people who lived in rural areas and who continued to practice traditional polytheistic religions, while Christianity spread more rapidly in urban areas.Late Latin camminus is an unusual exception of a Gaulish common noun that entered the Romance languages generally via the Latin.
As to Latin paganus, of course it means primarily "inhabitant of a pagus", which is to say someone living in the countryside or in a village, and as an adjective it characterises the customs and traditions of those who live in such places.
The primary derived word is BTW not "pagan" but more simply "peasant", originally and still to a degree meaning inhabitant of a pagus > pays. It could be translated into the English "local" in some uses.
So I would be extremely wary of any 19th to 21st Century claims about so-called "pagans" in relation to early Christianity.
As to "pagan origins", what does this mean ? That peregrini (foreigners) travel from pagus to pagus (from one pueblo to the next) and that makes the Camino ?
I don't see a conflict between a news media article and a science journal article. Both are conveying the same information but using different language and levels of detail, tailored for different audiences. The core questions remain the same: How? and Why?LOL, I just had a Déja Vu experience: news media article versus science journal article.
In this case, i.e. the stone from Stonehenge, my eyes glazed over even more quickly when ploughing through the scientific article in the journal Nature than in the case of the bones from Santiago and the scientific article in the journal Antiquity.
Below is the link for the seriously interested - but be warned that you will not find the words camino de Santiago or Saint James or even pilgrimage in it. Enjoy reading!
A Scottish provenance for the Altar Stone of Stonehenge - Nature
Mineral ages and chemical analysis of fragments of the Altar Stone from the Neolithic stone circle at Stonehenge suggest that it was transported from northeast Scotland, more than 750 km away, probably by sea.www.nature.com
Indeed. Two words. Different roots. Two words look the same but have different meanings and different roots. Hint: That may be why French has chemin and cheminée. Or did you spot anything in the RAE that points to a Greek root?"camino"
Del latín vulgar cammīnus, voz de origen celta, y este de origen hispánico o hispánica; cf. celtíbero camanon.
https://dle.rae.es/camino
"caminus"
Latin
Etymology
Borrowed from Ancient Greek κάμῑνος (kámīnos).
Noun
fireplace
furnace, forge
(poetic) Vulcan's forge
(figuratively) fire
Thanks for that! I'm not trying to troll you; I just want to explore my thoughts. Please let me know if I'm off topic in this subforum 'pagan-origins-of-the-camino.'Indeed. Two words. Different roots. Two words look the same but have different meaning and different roots. Hint: That's why French has chemin and cheminée. Or did you spot anything in the RAE that points to a Greek root?
Since you get your info from Wiktionary, I recommend that also consult their entry for camminus. Quote: First attested in writing in the late 7th century in Spain. Borrowed from Gaulish *kamman, from Proto-Celtic *kanxsman; compare Celtiberian kamanom and Irish céim (“step, degree”). Sheesh.
An anachronistic claim, given that the Latin word paganus is centuries older than Christianity.The term pagan originated from the Latin word paganus, which originally meant "country dweller" or "rustic." It was used to describe people who lived in rural areas and who continued to practice traditional polytheistic religions, while Christianity spread more rapidly in urban areas.
You are attributing semantic development in mediaeval theology after the death of classical Graeco-Roman paganism to what it has no relation to.As Christianity became the dominant religion in the Roman Empire and later in Europe, the word pagan began to take on a negative connotation.
Given that the pejorative connotations of the word existed in pre-Christian Latin, in attitudes persisting to this day among "sophisticated" city dwellers towards country "bumpkins", I would seriously doubt your suggestions, characterised as they seem to be by some similar types of value judgments.It was used by Christians to describe people who did not convert to Christianity, and it often carried implications of being backward, uncivilized, or even immoral. This pejorative usage reflected the belief that non-Christians were outside the "true" faith and were therefore spiritually inferior or misguided.
"It is crucial to stress right from the start that until the 20th century, people did not call themselves pagans to describe the religion they practised. The notion of paganism, as it is generally understood today, was created by the early Christian Church. It was a label that Christians applied to others, one of the antitheses that were central to the process of Christian self-definition. As such, throughout history it was generally used in a derogatory sense."An anachronistic claim, given that the Latin word paganus is centuries older than Christianity.
You are attributing semantic development in mediaeval theology after the death of classical Graeco-Roman paganism to what it has no relation to.
Given that the pejorative connotations of the word existed in pre-Christian Latin, in attitudes persisting to this day among "sophisticated" city dwellers towards country "bumpkins", I would seriously doubt your suggestions, characterised as they seem to be by some similar types of value judgments.
the historical usage of the term was indeed pejorative and was used to contrast "pagans" with the "civilized" Christians.
No, originally it was "civilised and urban" versus "ignorant and rural".
Ignoring the humans that had been in the "new world" all the way to Chile and Canada for 12-15,000 years! The wheel was never used in the Americas before Columbus except in toys. Strange that migrants would not bring their signature invention. Or wheat, their signature foodstuff. Without Peruvians, there could never have been an Irish potato famine...The exploration of America did not begin with Christians; "pagans," such as the Vikings, had already arrived in America before them.
The claims in those quotes are incorrect as to the word history."It is crucial to stress right from the start that until the 20th century, people did not call themselves pagans to describe the religion they practised. The notion of paganism, as it is generally understood today, was created by the early Christian Church. It was a label that Christians applied to others, one of the antitheses that were central to the process of Christian self-definition. As such, throughout history it was generally used in a derogatory sense."
Owen Davies, Paganism: A Very Short Introduction, 2011
"The adoption of paganus by the Latin Christians as an all-embracing, pejorative term for polytheists represents an unforeseen and singularly long-lasting victory, within a religious group, of a word of Latin slang originally devoid of religious meaning. The evolution occurred only in the Latin west, and in connection with the Latin church. Elsewhere, Hellene or gentile (ethnikos) remained the word for pagan; and paganos continued as a purely secular term, with overtones of the inferior and the commonplace."
Peter Brown, Late Antiquity, 1999
It sounds nice and poetic and I like the sound of itTo be sure
Where human goes
Paths follow.
There was more to the post..but i needed to chew on the ideaIt sounds nice and poetic and I like the sound of it.
But the physical road to Santiago exists because it connects towns and because people had business to go to these towns, all sorts of business. The town of Santiago is at the end of the Road to Santiago but this road is also the Road to Leon, the Road to Burgos, the Road to Pamplona, and it is a road in both directions.
The non-physical road to Santiago, the Pilgrimage Road to Santiago, the Pilgrimage to Santiago exists because of Christian beliefs in general, and in particular Christian beliefs and mindset in the Middle Ages and in particular from the period starting around 1000 or 1100.
Nobody today needs to be aware of this or be interested in it. But if one wants to talk origin than one needs to inform oneself about this.
In the recent articles about scientific research of the skeleton of Teodomiro, bishop of Padrón in the 9th century, he is described in some news articles as the originator of the pilgrimage to Santiago. In a way, one can say that the person or persons who brought relics of a Christian or of a person important in Christian beliefs to a church in a town were the initiators of the pilgrimage to this town that subsequently developed. But the origin of the medieval pilgrimage phenomenon lies in that period of time and how thinking about aspects of the Christian faith developed in that period of time after the millennium. Going on pilgrimage to the relics of a Christian martyr, of a Eucharistic miracle or of a Marian miracle became a mass phenomenon and it was no longer an endeavour of the odd fervent (and often wealthy) believer or of monks and of members of the clergy.
The roots of Christianity lie in the mind, in thinking. They lie in the biblical stories and their interpretation, in what is regarded as the teaching of Jesus, and these fundamentals were further developed and interpreted by Paul, by other early "Fathers" of the Church and many others. The wells and trees that are said to have been turned into Holy Wells or Holy trees by the Christian missionaries in Europe, or the festivals that are said to have been turned into Christian festivals like Christmas - they are not the roots of Christian belief. They are accessories. They were absorbed and integrated within the prevalent religious-cultural landscape, they aren't roots.
In my humble opinion, one needs to dive into the mind of medieval people to understand the European medieval pilgrimage phenomenon. These bones, these miracles - they meant something else to them than they mean to us today. And while there may be superficial similarities with other pilgrimages in other parts of the world or at other times, the core is different. Saying that it means going to a holy place misses the point. The "Camino de Santiago" and all the other pilgrimages to Rome, to Aachen, to Canterbury, to Einsiedeln, to Wilsnack, to Le Puy - it is a unique phenomenon of the time period 1000-1500.
Well, there is belief and there is knowledge - in my humble view at least. As I said, I tend to let people believe whatever they want to believe while walking. If it is about knowledge and on the forum - well that's different.It simply exists
There is a path
Lets go
Ime glad they took the interest!Well, there is belief and there is knowledge - in my humble view at least. As I said, I tend to let people believe whatever they want to believe while walking. If it is about knowledge and on the forum - well that's different.
Take this example: Forum members from around the world share that they hear the Call of the Camino and just have to go. OK. I personally rarely feel a need to share why I walked. Or walk. But some of my interest lies with the bunch of French academics, some secular laypersons, some with a function in the Catholic Church, who started, after WII, to take an interest in the history of the medieval pilgrimage to Santiago and in the traces that are left to this day - not only in buildings and in art and in literature but also on the ground. Their enthusiasm and their knowledge and their pioneering work were quickly picked up in other European countries and in Spain and there in particular in Estella. A decade later, a Spanish politician who was a native of Galicia, saw the potential of their cultural-religious heritage and it snowballed from there. Without these people and without their efforts, would the Call of the Camino be heard today in the USA and Australia and Canada and New Zealand and elsewhere so far away from Santiago?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?