Wow! So many emotional posts in so short a time.
I am staying out of this debate, except to state that I am a pilgrim in the broad meaning of the word. I am a Christian who walks to a holy place to escape myself, yet to find myself, to find meaning, to experience life pared back to its essentials, to help others, to be nourished by others, to empty myself out that I might be refilled with something better, and to give and to receive what the Camino has to offer.
This said, I would simply add that the Camino has, for the first millennia of it's existence, (about 1,200 years) been primarily a Christian pilgrimage to a declared, official holy site (the relics of St. James the Greater beneath the altar at the Cathedral in Santiago de Compostela).
The Camino de Sanitago was first established for that specific purpose to walk to the crypt and to venerate the relics. That remains the central focus to this day. However, we all know that people do the Camino for any number of reasons, some religious, others more secular.
Folks who do the Camino and encounter any shrine, cross, statue, or other evidently spiritual structure or edifice should respect that standing, at least that is my view of the matter. I believe it is a matter of basic civility and respect for others. It DOES NOT declare that one religion is superior to another. It DOES declare that basic respect should be accorded others' beliefs.
Surely, those of you who have walked the full
Camino Frances, have seen the pentagram (five-pointed star) window on the western wall of the old San Anton ruins? Strange? Weird? Odd? Curious? Perhaps, but who am I to judge?
Cruz de Ferro is not, in and of itself a religious structure. But, much in the same way one should not desecrate or disrespect any shrine of any religious belief system, I submit that pilgrims should not engage in frivolous behavior at this site. It is IMHO disrespectful of the millions of pilgrims who likely accord special meaning or significance. It is that reverence and significance that accords and argues for protection and respect for this, arguably, secular monument to accomplishment.
I do not know the exact, original, reason why an iron cross was mounted atop a tall wooden pole, but I do know that there are previous (well weathered and rusted) iterations of the cross displayed in museums along the Camino. For example, there is one (or more) in the Archbishop's Residence (now a museum) at Astorga. I do know that the Spanish writer, Alonso de Castillo Solórzano wrote about the cross in the early 1600s.
So, the Cruz de Ferro has been a significant location along the
Camino Frances for at least 400 years. The original significance is likely lost to time. But, why not simply behave in a mature and sober manner? In an era where all sorts of problems confront our society, why NOT simply act like an adult and behave responsibly?
I know that I originally stated I would not be drawn in, but as I thought and wrote, I become more concerned about the encroaching secularization of the Camino. So, I am offering a reasonable explanation of my thoughts on this issue in the hopes that others might agree and pass it on...
I hope this clarifies the debate on this matter.