When did a Refugio become an Albergue?

[jsalt]

Just curious, but interested to know.

On my first camino (2012) they were all known as “albergues”, but I often read books, articles, etc, published before 2012 that refer to them as “refugios”.

When, why, and how did “refugios” become “albergues”?

 

[Bradypus]

The transition was underway between my first 2 Caminos (1990 and 2002) Can't remember hearing the term 'albergue' on the first walk. Some of the early refugios were very basic and bore little resemblance to the later albergues. In the most extreme cases a concrete floor, four walls and access to cold water and a toilet but no shower. Or furniture. Definitely more of a 'shelter' than a 'hostel' As facilities improved a more exalted name might have seemed justified!

 

[peregrina2000]

I can add some dates to this. On my first camino in 2000 they were still called refugios. I think “albergue” may have been starting to creep into the lexicon, but refugio was still the go-to term.

 

[KinkyOne]

On some less walked Caminos the places described by @Bradypus are still called "refugios" or even "acogidas" (municipales). And a shelter is basically all you need

 

[Elle Bieling]

So I must ask, in light of today, is there a difference between an albergue and a refúgio??

 

[nycwalking]

My first camino was 2001, most were called refugios.

By 2002, albergue was sneaking in the vocabulary.

By 2004 albergue was the word, and it has stuck.

 

[janinedawn]

Just curious, but interested to know.

On my first camino (2012) they were all known as “albergues”, but I often read books, articles, etc, published before 2012 that refer to them as “refugios”.

When, why, and how did “refugios” become “albergues”?

I cannot speak to this question, but it urges one more important to me: Why are there tours on the Camino where people move en masse with tourist guides and carry lots of luggage that is transported for them? They reserve up the hostels and escape the primary experience of a pilgrimage. I do not understand using this model of travel on this kind of tour which is historically a "pilgrimage," a unique and solo experience, not the usual group travel tour.
My first and only walk was in May and I only walked 125 miles on that trip, with other things to attend to in southern Spain. I loved the walk and met up with 5 others with whom I became a loose walking group. We reserved ahead for rooms together and planned, therefore, distances to walk each day. It was a lovely group of compatible people. In particular I had prearranged to walk with a French Canadian woman I met online in Camino blogpost who turned out to be a gem of a person.
The trip was not what I imagined beforehand, but whatever is? I had thought about a fairly solo trip where I stayed longer periods at various stops and spent more time sketching and journaling my thoughts, helping to evolve the changes within, in response to the experience. Once one becomes a part of a group, one is part of an organism and tacitly (or not) conforms to the organism to make it most successful. And on the whole, it was that.
But I return to my question, when did the "tourist" group enter the scene, with stays in majorly comfortable inns, traveling en masse, enter the stage?

 

[Felipe]

I think that in the Spanish recent usage "refugio" has become associated with mountains (as in "refugio alpino"). That is, a building that could be very, very basic (as the "refugio Izandorre", before Lepoeder, just a bare hut) or a more established, commercial establishment, but that is not properly a hotel. I have seen also "refugio" for stray animals (there is one in Vitoria, with dozens of cats...it was something worth to see).

 

[JabbaPapa]

I can add some dates to this. On my first camino in 2000 they were still called refugios. I think “albergue” may have been starting to creep into the lexicon, but refugio was still the go-to term.

Back in the 1990s some of them were called refugios, and some of them were called albergues.

Though to some degree, the terms can in some circumstances be interchangeable for some of the resting places.

A refugio tends to be more bare-bones, whereas an albergue tends to be a more comfortable hostel-type place (though it's possible that for the Camino, a technical difference between the two might be mere size and number of beds available) -- so I think the change in terminology is a reflection of the fact that as time has gone on, the pilgrim lodgings have become more and more comfortable, and so the refugios have become albergues.

 

[JabbaPapa]

historically a "pilgrimage," a unique and solo experience, not the usual group travel tour

erm, historically, pilgrims in fact tended to constitute large groups rather than travelling solo.

This was for reasons like mutual protection against such dangers as wolves and brigands, but also for such sundries as trying to negociate a "group rate" for fees to cross a toll bridge or hire a ferry crossing.

There has also been a long tradition of pilgrims going solo or in twos or threes of course, but it is mistaken to suppose that this were the only "proper" way of getting yourself to Compostela, even though it is the more "purist" manner of it.

Besides, I think you're trying to tar all of these groups with the same brush -- some of them, despite availing themselves of all comforts and mod cons, nevertheless do walk every single step of the Way to Santiago, exactly as one would hope them to be doing.

And again, it is mistaken to suppose that a pilgrim is "supposed" to go threadbare -- wealthy pilgrims in the Middle Ages would tend to stay in better lodgings and eat better food and dress more expensively as well, exactly the same.

The pilgrims who went deliberately threadbare, who existed too, did so for religious reasons of penitence and prayer and reparation for sins ; not because they were searching for some sort of dubious nostalgic "authenticity".

 

[Kathor1]

I cannot speak to this question, but it urges one more important to me: Why are there tours on the Camino where people move en masse with tourist guides and carry lots of luggage that is transported for them?

Well, I think that's because we are a diverse lot, in a free society, where not everyone has to conform to a specific mode of behaviour and people are allowed to find happiness in their own way during their leisure time or annual time off from work. Maybe also because the concept of pilgrimage, and that includes the concept of Christian pilgrimage in Europe, is much wider than many imagine, both in the past and in the present. There's also this thing called "cultural route".

As to the question of this thread, there's an entry in Xacopedia about albergues that sheds light on why and when some of the accommodations available on the Camino Frances were once called refugio and later albergue, or rather albergue de peregrinos. The entry confirms what forum members say who had walked already some 20 years ago: albergue or albergue for pilgrims is a modern concept, born in the 1980s, that refers to the space where pilgrims spend the night who travel along the Camino de Santiago on foot, on horseback or by bicycle. The first pilgrim albergues emerged in Spain and France in the 1990s. They gradually replaced the refugios that were a much more modest type of facility - sometimes without even minimal functionality - and that served the first modern pilgrims in the 1970s and 1980s.

A pivotal year was the Holy Year 1993 when Spanish government organisations, in particular those in Galicia and in some towns along the Camino Frances, created a large network of albergues de peregrinos.

Nowadays of course there are not only albergues de peregrinos, there's a plethora of accommodations created by the private sector, ranging from private albergues (the majority of which are not exclusively for foot pilgrims but also for tourists) to casa rurales and hostals (hostal, not hostel) and small hotels. All of them are commercial enterprises.

 

[David Tallan]

I cannot speak to this question, but it urges one more important to me: Why are there tours on the Camino where people move en masse with tourist guides and carry lots of luggage that is transported for them? They reserve up the hostels and escape the primary experience of a pilgrimage. I do not understand using this model of travel on this kind of tour which is historically a "pilgrimage," a unique and solo experience, not the usual group travel tour.

My first thought when reading this was "This was written by someone who has never read The Canterbury Tales ." For those unfamiliar with the work, written by Geoffrey Chaucer about a pilgrimage just over 600 years ago, it follows a group on pilgrimage to the shrine of St. Thomas Becket in Canturbury. The group of pilgrims (who are riding to Canterbury, not walking and carrying their own luggage) tell each other stories in a sort of contest. Those stories are the "Canterbury Tales". Clearly, pilgrimages have not historically been exclusively "a unique and solo experience".

There are tours like that because that is how some people want to get themselves to Santiago de Compostela. Just as there is an airport there because that is how others want to get themselves there. I'm not saying that is the kind of Camino or pilgrim experience I want, but clearly it is what some are looking for and there are those willing to give it to them.

 

[arturo garcia]

In the middle ages they were called "Hospital" or "Hospitales de Peregrinos".

 

[annakappa]

Guacelmo in Rabanal is still called Refugio Guacelmo, not Albergues Guacelmo.
Interesting enough , here in Costa Rica an Albergue means a shelter for folks during very bad weather conditions, such as floods, landslides or also a severe earthquake or volcanic eruption.

 

[Bradypus]

Guacelmo in Rabanal is still called Refugio Guacelmo, not Albergues Guacelmo.

I think that Refugio Guacelmo was opened in 1991. Which must make it amongst the earliest refugios/albergues still in continuous use on the Frances. "Albergue" was not in common use in 1991. I suppose no one thought it worthwhile to change the name as fashions changed.

 

[malingerer]

I think that Refugio Guacelmo was opened in 1991. Which must make it amongst the earliest refugios/albergues still in continuous use on the Frances. "Albergue" was not in common use in 1991. I suppose no one thought it worthwhile to change the name as fashions changed.

I think for what it is worth, and very much a personal belief, that this is the nub of the problem, if problem it be. Fashions change but pilgrimage does not. You can be alone in the midst of a crocodile of pilgrims stretching from horizon to horizon and it is totally immaterial as to what you wear or how you have got there. The Self travels alone using you as transport and it cares not whether that you are laying your head down on a rock or on a four poster bed! I still love the older word "Refugio" as that is what it meant to me back in 2004. An Albergue then meant more physical improvements, like the ones with swimming pools which had me gobsmacked the first time I encountered one Didja hear me complain? Nope! Like the cheap room I got in Burgos one year. Bare walls, bare light bulb. Grim! But then after seeing the Cathedral and having something to eat, when I returned to that room I realised it had what I needed; a bed, a chair, shared toilet and bathroom and the little old lady who owned the place had a nice smile! I slept soundly and went on my way the following day. I never cared much what the place was described as, it had fulfilled its function and I was content with that.
Walk soft

stay safe

Vaya con Dios,

The Malingerer.

 

[Kathor1]

Is Gaucelmo the refugio with the legendary teatime? That looks more albergue than refugio to me.

 

[JabbaPapa]

In the middle ages they were called "Hospital" or "Hospitales de Peregrinos".

The original "Hospital" diverged into the words Hospital, Hotel, Hostel.

 

[Romannoa]

Here is the translation for refuge, I always though that it was the same refugios or albergues

 

[Ungawawa]

Refugio to me sounds a lot more basic. Like a roof over your head but don't count on much more. Back in the days this was the case too. The German yellow guidebook says that the Rabanal Refugio was one of the first on the Camino to have the incredible luxury of hot running water... only in the late 90s! My, how things change

 

[Lindsay53]

In the middle ages they were called "Hospital" or "Hospitales de Peregrinos".

There is an albergue in Granon with the official name of 'Hospital San Juan Bautista'.

 

[annakappa]

Is Gaucelmo the refugio with the legendary teatime? That looks more albergue than refugio to me.

View attachment 63902

That’s because some kind pilgrim or one of the hospitaleros (wardens they are called at Guacelmo) had the inspiration to bake something delicious . The kitchen facilities at Guacelmo is one of the best!

 

[JabbaPapa]

Refugio to me sounds a lot more basic. Like a roof over your head but don't count on much more. Back in the days this was the case too. The German yellow guidebook says that the Rabanal Refugio was one of the first on the Camino to have the incredible luxury of hot running water... only in the late 90s! My, how things change

Most had running water of some sort in the early 90s -- but Rabanal was one of the only ones before O Cebreiro to have it hot.

But quite a few of the Albergues (for instance) set up in Galicia for the Holy Year 1993 were quite a bit more comfortable then than they are now after the degradations of time ...

Then again you did also get to sleep on the odd dirt floor in a converted animal barn with just a haphazard low pressure cold water shower head behind a thin plastic curtain for your modesty ...

 

[Bradypus]

Then again you did also get to sleep on the odd dirt floor in a converted animal barn with just a haphazard low pressure cold water shower head behind a thin plastic curtain for your modesty ...

Not even that occasionally. In one place there was a shower room with three or four shower heads but no doors or partitions - not even a door between the showers and the dorm. Midway through having my shower a young Spanish woman walked in, greeted me politely, hung the towel she had been wearing on a hook and started to wash herself too. Something of a surprise...

 

[Ungawawa]

Most had running water of some sort in the early 90s -- but Rabanal was one of the only ones before O Cebreiro to have it hot.

But quite a few of the Albergues (for instance) set up in Galicia for the Holy Year 1993 were quite a bit more comfortable then than they are now after the degradations of time ...

Then again you did also get to sleep on the odd dirt floor in a converted animal barn with just a haphazard low pressure cold water shower head behind a thin plastic curtain for your modesty ...

Haha now it makes more sense how Shirley McClaine said she had reporters intruding on her showers to take photos.

I wonder if we're due another round of modernisations ready for 2021?

 

[Thomas@Albany]

Thankx for the clarification. I walked the Frances in two parts (October 2018 and May 2019). For my birthday, a high school friend gave me Hape Kerkeling's book on walking the Camino in 2001, and it's all "refugios." I was wondering about whether it was merely semantic, or not. The postings here answered my question.

 

[Thomas@Albany]

There is an albergue in Granon with the official name of 'Hospital San Juan Bautista'.

My night in that church attic, the communal dinner, and the prayer service in the choir at night, was the most touching night in many years, I will remember it for a long time.

 

[markmcilroy]

Refugios.....to Albergues.......next there will be Best Westerns in every town.

 

[Kanga]

Definitely refugio on my first Camino in 2001, but my daughter, who walked in 2004 says that the word then was Albergue.

 

[Stephen Nicholls]

So I must ask, in light of today, is there a difference between an albergue and a refúgio??

About 5 euros, I think

 

[lt56ny]

I don't know if people still do this but I remember when I first walked the Brierley guide and in some other sites that I read broke down the different types of sleeping accommodations. There was a distinction, if I remember correctly between Refugio and Albergue. Is my memory that bad and I am wrong? I bet if someone has an old guide from Brierley they will find his definitions of the two. I do have a vague recollection that the Refugio was the most basic of all places to lay your head at night.

 

[JabbaPapa]

I don't know if people still do this but I remember when I first walked the Brierley guide and in some other sites that I read broke down the different types of sleeping accommodations. There was a distinction, if I remember correctly between Refugio and Albergue. Is my memory that bad and I am wrong?

The three most basic types of accommodation are the Refugio, the Hostel (not called that in Spanish), and the Albergue.

It's confusing that the three types blend into each other to a great degree with some rather wide grey zones.

A Refugio (Refuge) can be anything between a hut that you can lay down on the floor or on some very basic bedding (mattress or mattress on something like a metal frame) with no other comforts for your sleep other than what you're carrying on your back, so no running water nor anything else, and little or none of what many today would consider as the most basic accommodations with at least a proper bed and electrics and a shower room and someone at least basically responsible for the place and willing to help. (my first sleeping place last year after crossing into Spain over the Perthus was one of these, and they existed on the Francès back in the 90s)

(that's BTW a good step up from the absolute most basic indoor accommodations which involve garage floors, outside barns, abandoned wooden huts, and so on)

Hostels (sometimes called Hostals but more often Albergues in Spanish) are generally speaking the same as the above but with facilities so that you can cook your own food, or maybe located in the same building as a restaurant, and they provide a cheap but ordinarily acceptable place to sleep, plus better hot water and toilets. They're usually either quite tiny or they have the simplest bunk bed accommodation. Rather uncommon on the Francès, and they're located mostly nowadays on the minor Camino routes inside Spain else outside Spain altogether. They exist mostly in places with very few pilgrims passing through. Quite a few of them do provide facilities so you can make yourself some rudimentary breakfast in the morning, plus somebody who can help at least a little.

Albergues are the whole range between a basic Hostel and a basic Hotel. Bunk beds usually on the Francès, though you can from time to time come across individual beds or even bedrooms. They are anyway the most common type of pilgrim accommodation along the Francès nowadays. It is not uncommon that they will provide dinner for a price, as well as more often a breakfast. They vary in nature a lot more than the other two categories, so they are harder to define. But they do have in common that they try and provide at least some basic degree of comfort.

 

[C clearly]

Perhaps I am splitting hairs, but I offer a clarification....

There was a distinction, if I remember correctly between Refugio and Albergue.

The term "refugio" seems to be rarely used now. If I heard it used, I would assume that the most basic accommodation is being referenced, but would not be sure.

Hostels (sometimes called Hostals but more often Albergues in Spanish)

The word "hostel" means different things in different languages, and it is not generally used in the Spanish context. In English, it usually means a multi-bed dormitory accommodation where people pay for use of one bed. In Spain, along the camino, these lodgings are typically called albergues. Albergues cover quite a range - sometimes private rooms are also available; sometimes there are cooking facilities, swimming pools, private rooms, etc., whereas sometimes they are very basic.

The word "hostal" in Spain refers to a type of hotel-like accommodation, generally with private rooms. Baths may be shared in some cases, and there may be a restaurant, but they are not likely to have cooking facilities for the guests to use. Hostales tend to be smaller family-run places, without certain services that a full hotel would have.

As @JabbaPapa described, albergues cover a big range and are the most common type of pilgrim accommodation on the Camino Frances. To add to the confusions, some places may use both words ("hostal" and "albergue") in their name.

 

[Friend from Barquinha]

erm, historically, pilgrims in fact tended to constitute large groups rather than travelling solo.

The Canterbury Tales - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

(Written 1387-1400)

"The tales (mostly written in verse, although some are in prose) are presented as part of a story-telling contest by a group of pilgrims as they travel together from London to Canterbury to visit the shrine of Saint Thomas Becket at Canterbury Cathedral."

(In my rush to respond, I didn't see that David had already addressed this; the link to Wikipedia may be interesting for some, so I'll leave it )

 

[Bradypus]

"The tales (mostly written in verse, although some are in prose) are presented as part of a story-telling contest by a group of pilgrims as they travel together from London to Canterbury to visit the shrine of Saint Thomas Becket at Canterbury Cathedral."

I wouldn't take Chaucer too literally as a historical guide to pilgrimage in his day. He knew a good plot device when he saw one and the idea of putting a disparate bunch of pilgrims together makes a fine frame to hang a bunch of short stories on

 

[lt56ny]

The three most basic types of accommodation are the Refugio, the Hostel (not called that in Spanish), and the Albergue.

It's confusing that the three types blend into each other to a great degree with some rather wide grey zones.

A Refugio (Refuge) can be anything between a hut that you can lay down on the floor or on some very basic bedding (mattress or mattress on something like a metal frame) with no other comforts for your sleep other than what you're carrying on your back, so no running water nor anything else, and little or none of what many today would consider as the most basic accommodations with at least a proper bed and electrics and a shower room and someone at least basically responsible for the place and willing to help. (my first sleeping place last year after crossing into Spain over the Perthus was one of these, and they existed on the Francès back in the 90s)

(that's BTW a good step up from the absolute most basic indoor accommodations which involve garage floors, outside barns, abandoned wooden huts, and so on)

Hostels (sometimes called Hostals but more often Albergues in Spanish) are generally speaking the same as the above but with facilities so that you can cook your own food, or maybe located in the same building as a restaurant, and they provide a cheap but ordinarily acceptable place to sleep, plus better hot water and toilets. They're usually either quite tiny or they have the simplest bunk bed accommodation. Rather uncommon on the Francès, and they're located mostly nowadays on the minor Camino routes inside Spain else outside Spain altogether. They exist mostly in places with very few pilgrims passing through. Quite a few of them do provide facilities so you can make yourself some rudimentary breakfast in the morning, plus somebody who can help at least a little.

Albergues are the whole range between a basic Hostel and a basic Hotel. Bunk beds usually on the Francès, though you can from time to time come across individual beds or even bedrooms. They are anyway the most common type of pilgrim accommodation along the Francès nowadays. It is not uncommon that they will provide dinner for a price, as well as more often a breakfast. They vary in nature a lot more than the other two categories, so they are harder to define. But they do have in common that they try and provide at least some basic degree of comfort.

So my old brain memory is still ok, haha. I

 

[David Tallan]

I wouldn't take Chaucer too literally as a historical guide to pilgrimage in his day. He knew a good plot device when he saw one and the idea of putting a disparate bunch of pilgrims together makes a fine frame to hang a bunch of short stories on

True, but he probably knew more about the manner of fourteenth century pilgrimages than anyone alive today does. And if the plot device he used was too outlandish and dissimilar to fourteenth century pilgrimages, his audience wouldn't have found it a fine frame to hang a bunch of short stories on. At the risk of being too topical, it is similar to the case in The Decameron. People telling each other stories to while away the time after fleeing from the city to the country to avoid a plague is a fine frame to hang a bunch of short stories on. That doesn't mean people weren't fleeing the cities to avoid the plague.

 

[Bradypus]

True, but he probably knew more about the manner of fourteenth century pilgrimages than anyone alive today does.

I have just seen that Audible are making some of their audiobooks available online for free while schools in the UK are closed. Mostly childrens' books but with a few titles for older listeners too. Included in the offer is an unabridged multi-voice recording of The Canterbury Tales in a modern English translation. I do not know if this is accessible for those outside the UK.

Audible Stories | Audible.com

Free stories for kids of all ages. Audible Stories is a free website where kids of all ages can listen to hundreds of Audible audio titles across six different languages—English, Spanish, French, German, Italian and Japanese—for free, so they can keep learning, dreaming and just being kids.

stories.audible.com

 

[Kanga]

There were no albergues in 2001. They were all refugios. The places that were called refugios in 2001 were called albergues by 2004. Same places, same facilities, same people running them, different names.

 

[billwalker]

I cannot speak to this question, but it urges one more important to me: Why are there tours on the Camino where people move en masse with tourist guides and carry lots of luggage that is transported for them? They reserve up the hostels and escape the primary experience of a pilgrimage. I do not understand using this model of travel on this kind of tour which is historically a "pilgrimage," a unique and solo experience, not the usual group travel tour.
My first and only walk was in May and I only walked 125 miles on that trip, with other things to attend to in southern Spain. I loved the walk and met up with 5 others with whom I became a loose walking group. We reserved ahead for rooms together and planned, therefore, distances to walk each day. It was a lovely group of compatible people. In particular I had prearranged to walk with a French Canadian woman I met online in Camino blogpost who turned out to be a gem of a person.
The trip was not what I imagined beforehand, but whatever is? I had thought about a fairly solo trip where I stayed longer periods at various stops and spent more time sketching and journaling my thoughts, helping to evolve the changes within, in response to the experience. Once one becomes a part of a group, one is part of an organism and tacitly (or not) conforms to the organism to make it most successful. And on the whole, it was that.
But I return to my question, when did the "tourist" group enter the scene, with stays in majorly comfortable inns, traveling en masse, enter the stage?

Three points in reply. I struggle to see the difference between people who "reserve up the hostels" and people who reserve ahead each day. I tend to walk until I feel like stopping. In any event, as you allude to yourself, these organised groups tend to stay in the better quality inns/hotels rather than the albergues. The Camino is for everyone, whether they want to walk solo or in a group. There is no rule that says you have to walk a pilgrimage on your own. If there was, we would probably never have had the Canterbury Tales. ,

 

[Bradypus]

There were no albergues in 2001. They were all refugios. The places that were called refugios in 2001 were called albergues by 2004. Same places, same facilities, same people running them, different names.

Revisiting this old thread. I found my diary from my 1990 pilgrimage quite recently. I thought it had been lost. Reading through it again I find that there were a few places called "Albergue" even in 1990 after all. Though the majority were known as "refugios" then. Odd how the mind plays tricks with memory after so long!

 

[nycwalking]

Revisiting this old thread. I found my diary from my 1990 pilgrimage quite recently. I thought it had been lost. Reading through it again I find that there were a few places called "Albergue" even in 1990 after all. Though the majority were known as "refugios" then. Odd how the mind plays tricks with memory after so long!

In 2001 on my first walk most lodgings were called refugios. At least that was the word I heard.

However, in 2002, albergue was the word used for the same places.

Back to original question: Why the change?