- Time of past OR future Camino
- 2012, 2013, 2014.
Remove ads on the forum by becoming a donating member. More here. |
---|
Ok, with my fear of water, that would end my camino I am afraid. Wow, unbelievableConditions are a bit wet on the Camino at the moment....
View attachment 28317
Photo courtesy of Amazing World Places.
That is very scary, will have to research that part of the journeyView attachment 28319 Hasn't changed too much since June then;-)View attachment 28321 View attachment 28322
OK, am breathing again, did my research, not part of Camino Frances!That is very scary, will have to research that part of the journey
Love the picture.Conditions are a bit wet on the Camino at the moment....
View attachment 28317
Photo courtesy of Amazing World Places.
If you rigged the poncho properly over the hiking poles, you'd have a boat.I would've worn me poncho at least.
What a good idea that is! I can see myself now, as Toad, in "Wind in the Willows", going down the stream with Badger, Ratty and Mole running along the bank in pursuit.If you rigged the poncho properly over the hiking poles, you'd have a boat.
What a good idea that is! I can see myself now, as Toad, in "Wind in the Willows", going down the stream with Badger, Ratty and Mole running along the bank in pursuit.
Thank you very much Kitsambler!
Gerard
Are you kidding Which Camino was this?View attachment 28319 Hasn't changed too much since June then;-)View attachment 28321 View attachment 28322
Maybe this will finally lead to agreement about the wisdom of waterproof footwear...
? Maybe you are joking? I have never been in that situation. However, my first thought is that I wouldn't attempt it without poles for balance, especially in moving water and when wearing a backpack which would make me top heavy. If the water isn't clear, I'd also want the poles to test for footing.why they need to use their poles I have no idea
This is the first time I've disagreed with GerardCarey (sorry).Some people just don't use their noggins.
Don't you think they'd use a pack cover.
I would've worn me poncho at least.
@C clearly? Maybe you are joking? I have never been in that situation. However, my first thought is that I wouldn't attempt it without poles for balance, especially in moving water and when wearing a backpack which would make me top heavy. If the water isn't clear, I'd also want the poles to test for footing.
However, maybe I'd find that the poles were not functional in that way in such deep water, and it is just a placebo. Can anyone comment?
Some interesting points to consider - in particular, facing upstream while stepping sideways, and using a solid stick instead of hollow poles. Thanks!@C clearly
I have used a walking stick for river crossings since Wally, a backcountry warden in Jasper National Park, instructed me in their use many years ago. Face the flow of the river and place your walking stick upstream of you in the water. Lean on it with both hands as necessary, using it for balance. Walk sideways across the current to the opposite bank, placing the stick in the current upstream of you, a little ahead of your route. A stick helps to keep one's balance in the current and when negotiating an irregular bottom with rolling rocks. I have learned two important things since: 1. a stick which you pick up on the bank may break halfway across, dumping you in the river; 2. an expensive purchased walking stick, if collapsible, will take in water and collapse while you are partway across. I would expect that the same is true of some poles. I do not use walking poles, which is partly illogical, as I have not come across difficult river crossings on the camino. But I am used to using a stick for balance wherever I walk. The poles in the photo do not appear to me to have any function, as the water looks more like a lake than a river and has a fairly level bottom. I would not use walking poles for this purpose: comparatively fragile and most are collapsible.
If you look really closely in my first picture above, you'll see the guy who is helping us cross is using his pole in exactly the way mentioned. He also instructed the kids to face upstream and walk sideways. Unfortunately you do not have to look too closely to see son did not follow the admonition to keep his arms locked across his front at all times - the water was cold (you can see *that* on his face) and he let go a little subconsciously hoping to avoid the deeper patch! Of course it was not life-threatening, although I doubt the girls would have managed to cross on their own - the current was swift and the rocky bottom quite uneven.@C clearly
I have used a walking stick for river crossings since Wally, a backcountry warden in Jasper National Park, instructed me in their use many years ago. Face the flow of the river and place your walking stick upstream of you in the water. Lean on it with both hands as necessary, using it for balance. Walk sideways across the current to the opposite bank, placing the stick in the current upstream of you, a little ahead of your route. A stick helps to keep one's balance in the current and when negotiating an irregular bottom with rolling rocks. I have learned two important things since: 1. a stick which you pick up on the bank may break halfway across, dumping you in the river; 2. an expensive purchased walking stick, if collapsible, will take in water and collapse while you are partway across. I would expect that the same is true of some poles. I do not use walking poles, which is partly illogical, as I have not come across difficult river crossings on the camino. But I am used to using a stick for balance wherever I walk. The poles in the photo do not appear to me to have any function, as the water looks more like a lake than a river and has a fairly level bottom. I would not use walking poles for this purpose: comparatively fragile and most are collapsible.
If you look really closely in my first picture above, you'll see the guy who is helping us cross is using his pole in exactly the way mentioned. He also instructed the kids to face upstream and walk sideways. Unfortunately you do not have to look too closely to see son did not follow the admonition to keep his arms locked across his front at all times - the water was cold (you can see *that* on his face) and he let go a little subconsciously hoping to avoid the deeper patch! Of course it was not life-threatening, although I doubt the girls would have managed to cross on their own - the current was swift and the rocky bottom quite uneven.
If I had had my way, the kids would also have undone the hipbelts on their packs so that they could flip out of them if necessary, but this lovely guy who had stopped in the rain knowing that we would soon be coming and could use a hand across the stream which was rising quite fast, assured me there was no need - he would not let go of the youngest! When I crossed with the other two, we undid out packs because I was not so confident of my own ability. By the way, the pole was priceless in finding the bottom and steadying against the flow.
This illustrates how each of us needs to have some knowledge and then assess the risks as they apply in each case! I would be inclined to undo the belt, but I walk with only a 7 kg pack. I can see the point about the heavier pack!It is very common in the Canadian Rocky Mountain parks to instruct hikers to undo their waist belts when crossing rivers and major streams. I tried it once. It put me extremely off balance. I prefer to retain my balance and avoid flipping over into the river.
@jiritThe picture also reminds of when my wife and I hiked the Abel Tasman coastal track in New Zealand and we crossed Torrent Bay estuary during high tide.
I was able to locate a sand bar that crisscrossed the entire estuary. I stripped down to my swimsuit, and waded across carrying my backpack above my head. I returned, and I repeated the same process carrying my wife's pack above my head. During the crossing, the water got so deep that I was barely able to carry the pack above my shoulders, without it touching the water.
@jirit
I was thinking that the photo reminded me of New Zealand. I walked part of the Abel Tasman track a couple of years ago, but did not overnight on it or attempt any water crossings.
No, you take off your trousers and socks to keep them dry (ever tried walking in soused kecks?) but put your boots back on cos you don't want to step on a sharp stone and lose the lot.No, it doesn't - when you see proper adventurers crossing rivers, they will typically take off their shoes and socks and put them on their shoulders to keep them dry
PS and why they need to use their poles I have no idea
It's closer to home . The photo was taken at Washington Olympic Peninsula by photographer Ian Coble, see Mountain Hardwear . The backpacks are Mountain Hardwear Outdry backpacks which have a watertight main compartment.
See also http://blog.iancoble.com/behind-the-scenes-mountain-hardwear-commercial-shoot/
Excellent work. This photo popped up on a Facebook hill walking page here at home and I thought it was an excellent one. It also reminded me of all the discussions on waterproof boots, shoes and other gear.It's closer to home . The photo was taken at Washington Olympic Peninsula by photographer Ian Coble, see Mountain Hardwear . The backpacks are Mountain Hardwear Outdry backpacks which have a watertight main compartment.
See also http://blog.iancoble.com/behind-the-scenes-mountain-hardwear-commercial-shoot/
@Jeff CrawleyNo, you take off your trousers and socks to keep them dry (ever tried walking in soused kecks?) but put your boots back on cos you don't want to step on a sharp stone and lose the lot.
No no! You are quiet correct. I was being facetious as to those underwater people in wayfarers photograph.This is the first time I've disagreed with GerardCarey (sorry).
On our last Camino my kids did not use pack covers, but instead used Macpac waterproof liners - despite a serious amount of rain, and sometimes torrential, and despite their packs being absolutely sodden, not one drop got into their gear. (I still prefer my Packa raincoat, but this was a good alternative we tried after finding pack covers to be less than perfect. Of course, a pack cover as well would have been a good option this spring but we were cutting weight)
I saw it on the page "Amazing World Places" that is why I mentioned them in the OP.It has certainly sparked a lively discussion .
I was initially convinced that it was photoshopped, that's why I was determined to find the original. And when I had found it, I felt the photographer deserved some credit .
No problem. I'll just add an inflatable boat to my backpack. And an outboard motor. A 5 horsepower should do.Conditions are a bit wet on the Camino at the moment....
View attachment 28317
Photo courtesy of Amazing World Places.
Very glad to hear that !OK, am breathing again, did my research, not part of Camino Frances!
I almost wish it was! Adds to the adventureOK, am breathing again, did my research, not part of Camino Frances!
I almost wish it was! Adds to the adventure
I do think I will have quite enough adventure without the water crossing!!!!I almost wish it was! Adds to the adventure
Welcome home and I admire your stamina and perseverance .!!!We have returned home to a very rainy winter and six weeks later the kids are still saying "At least we're not walking in it".
We look back with fondness on our Via de la Plata, but it was surely very wet. (And also got into the 30s, so there was quite a range)