Qwertyberty
New Member
- Time of past OR future Camino
- Le Puy - Santiago 2016
St Olav's - 2017??
Remove ads on the forum by becoming a donating member. More here. |
---|
And you'll walk around bud naked when doing your....laundry?
so what is the impact if you drop your pack's weight by 500 grams
Maybe simplicity is carrying your junk, no matter what it is, and not becoming neurotic about shaving grams off when you can carry it on happily. Keep your mind simple, first and foremost. Will I really feel so much better on my walk by buying 500$ of high tech gear to shave of 300 grams when I weigh 100 pounds more than I should? Don't think my feet will care if the weight they carry his my fat or overpriced techy materials.Or dropping it by 4.0 kg. From my current 5.4 kg t0 1.4 kg per post #5 above. Plus water in both cases.
The purpose is simplicity. Release from cares. A lot less to worry about.
I understand Albert Einstein once said "Keep things as simple as possible, but not simpler."
I understand that to be @Qwertyberty intention.
And good luck to her/him.
Just I don't think I could cope without a phone, camera, tablet, recharger etc, second change of clothes, poncho, towel and hiking kilt for dress up. Or the tent for my third and fourth trips in 2016 (and for times when I run out of gite in the last 200-300 km in France).
I agree! I would love to lose another 20-30 pounds of body fat and know that my joints would appreciate it. And if I didn't bring any of my electronics, my half roll of KT tape, a smaller tech towel, no mini roll of TP, wore my glasses instead of also my contact lenses and its paraphernalia, blah blah blah, yes I could cut down. I won't do it in actuality but it would be a fun paper exercise.Will I really feel so much better on my walk by buying 500$ of high tech gear to shave of 300 grams when I weigh 100 pounds more than I should? Don't think my feet will care if the weight they carry his my fat or overpriced techy materials.
If you were brave, you would post your packing list and let us at it!to reduce the weight of my pack. But I'm still not sure how to do that!
Just mulling over the ultra lightweight kit list - so far I've got the total weight carried down to about 2.5 kilos, including water and trail food. And walked 2 caminos with it.
But, I reckon it could be a lot less, so am now putting together the new,ultra ultra lightweight packing list. I know there have been posts on here about people carrying everything in their pockets - any experiences of this?? A spare pair of socks and a small bottle of water, is my aim.......or maybe forget the socks.
If you were brave, you would post your packing list and let us at it!
What kind of backpack do you use?
Sometimes the lightest backpack is no backpack !Just mulling over the ultra lightweight kit list - so far I've got the total weight carried down to about 2.5 kilos, including water and trail food. And walked 2 caminos with it.
But, I reckon it could be a lot less, so am now putting together the new,ultra ultra lightweight packing list. I know there have been posts on here about people carrying everything in their pockets - any experiences of this?? A spare pair of socks and a small bottle of water, is my aim.......or maybe forget the socks.
OK I did my paper study as a spring/fall camino with basics w/o being silly about it. With no electronics or knitting I'd have to be drugged for the entire 36 hours of flights (I am a fidgety flyer - must be entertained!). Does not include daily food or water, glasses only no contacts, no sunglasses, clothing is "a pair and a spare", bathroom bag is down to bare bones. Gives me no nice clothes for my extra days in Madrid. Bare bones on layering if it gets real cold or wet. And the best I can do is 4201 g / 9.26 pounds. (see attachment)
... I cannot figure out how to consolidate all my electronics into one fancy item. But maybe I'll post separately on that. ...
thanks for the link...that was an interesting read - can't wrap my mind traveling like that for myself but it does give me food for thought as far as continuing to downsize my everyday living. I have done a fair amount thus far, and it definitely feels MUCH better, but could do another run through. Think I'll clean out a closet today!You might be interested in this blog http://regevelya.com/travel-gear/ This guy travels the world only / nearly only with what he has in his pockets. Buen Camino, SY
That sounds like a true medieval experience.Sometimes the lightest backpack is no backpack !
Not that I will point to you but we had some very smelly experiences in an albergue once with a plilgrim who travelled "very light"
It seemed -and we smelled it -he had no extra set of cloths with him so was wearing his cloths all the time . Yagggg. But for shure he travelled "lite"
Buen camino
Good, very good, but if your clothes stink you won't be very pilgrim-friendly.Well, I was actually hoping for some input from anyone who had reduced their stuff down to "pockets only".
As stated, I have walked 2 caminos already with minimum (2.5kilos) gear, and as an intellectual, and hopefully, practical exercise, am planning to carry even less.
I will post my 2.5kg list next - right now loads of other stuff to do
True! You are absolutely right that the question can be a genuine exploration into reasons, and not necessarily a challenge. I still think it's a bit ironic here on the forum.WHY? Indeed, asking this question, from childhood, is the root of all knowledge.
The question was posed not to disparage, but to instigate the process of information exchange. That exact result is occurring. My task is accomplished.
Not stop asking "why" is to presume one knows everything. My hubris does not extend that far. I learn something new here everyday. In this case, I stirred the pot gently by asking the classic, probative question.
I have never been very good at getting the weight of my pack down. It's been about 9 or 10 kilos for the last decade.
And the best I can do is 4201 g / 9.26 pounds.
See attachment in my post up there -> it lists actual weights for everything FSO. There is no way in heck I'd only pack what I listed though. It was just an exercise on paper to see what I could do as a bare minimum for a spring or fall trip. No electronics, no comfort items, etc.@GreatDane -- I see your total weight is FSO (from the skin out), including your poles. That sure seems light to me! @peregrina2000 -- is your weight for your pack only or FSO?
Yeah, I thought the same thing! Just another kilo will get you a lot of comfort.here is no way in heck I'd only pack what I listed though.
Whew, I don't feel like such a slug now.See attachment in my post up there -> it lists actual weights for everything FSO. There is no way in heck I'd only pack what I listed though. It was just an exercise on paper to see what I could do as a bare minimum for a spring or fall trip. No electronics, no comfort items, etc.
I would love to lose another 20-30 pounds of body fat and know that my joints would appreciate it.
I have never been very good at getting the weight of my pack down. It's been about 9 or 10 kilos for the last decade.
My pack is very light, I think it's just 3 pounds
If you are happy to hike along with a heavy pack [and contents], then by all means do so.
Well, I was actually hoping for some input from anyone who had reduced their stuff down to "pockets only".
As stated, I have walked 2 caminos already with minimum (2.5kilos) gear, and as an intellectual, and hopefully, practical exercise, am planning to carry even less.
I will post my 2.5kg list next - right now loads of other stuff to do
Sometimes the lightest backpack is no backpack !
Not that I will point to you but we had some very smelly experiences in an albergue once with a plilgrim who travelled "very light"
It seemed -and we smelled it -he had no extra set of cloths with him so was wearing his cloths all the time . Yagggg. But for shure he travelled "lite"
Buen camino
This thread, as started by @Qwertyberty
Like my 0.8 kg two person tent (including poles, pegs and air mattress)
this is a fun concept
anything warm
What brand tent and mattress? My one person tent weighs more than this without mattress.
my ideas for a pockets only packing list:
-1 walking outfit including pants/shorts with lots of pockets
-1 night outfit including a small pair of swim shorts and a super light tee that could fit in a pocket
-1 extra pair of socks and undies
-1 tiny disposable poncho
-1 silk liner
-1 small water bottle
-1 small bar of soap
-passports and wallet
this is a fun concept but there are some pretty obvious problems that your would have to work out, the main one being cold weather. if you wanted to take anything warm you would either have to wear it every single day or i guess you could tie it around your waist when you didn't need it. anyway I'm pretty sure you could fit all this into pockets alone or maybe add a small bumbag. let me know what you think
Did he need to wear suspenders ("braces") to hold up his pants?Two pockets on his snow-proof trousers contained a change of briefs, second set of long underwear, second pair of hiking socks, a silk/polyester bag liner and flip flops.
I recently bought a set of [RibzWear front pack] to evaluate on my next Camino:
I seriously hope you have large pockets...and a deep wallet, containing enough Euros to buy all that gear you did not start with, but later decided the better of...
Then there must be two of these "stinky one". I met him on the caminho Inglès. Still smell him when I write about it. YagggI think I met that pilgrim, in Grañon of all places
If you were brave, you would post your packing list and let us at it!
What kind of backpack do you use?
You might be interested in this blog http://regevelya.com/travel-gear/ This guy travels the world only / nearly only with what he has in his pockets. Buen Camino, SY
This thread, as started by @Qwertyberty, was an assertion that twice he had walked a camino carrying a weight of 2.5 kg including trail food and water.
Then many, me included, offered exercises on paper. And we showed how @Qwertyberty number could be attained. And what would be left behind as a result.
Then the three letter word, FSO, was introduced. But not why full skin out was important. (To my mind FSO not important or even misleading: what goes on the scales just before I go out the door on a training day is the important thing, along with my FSI (full skin in, or body) weight.
All of the posts in this thread (a sample above) and others might seem a confusion to a new reader.
I would always exclude these things from any weight comparison.
And what does count is ONLY that which goes in the pack. For any one camino/trip/tramp/whatever this is the variable bit.
- shoes/boots: you have what you have because you need/love them or don't want to but a new pair at present;
- pack: this is similar to your shoes - you have what works for you;
- clothing and other stuff (such as phone, sweets, whatever) worn - you need something to prevent being arrested/molested.
So, if we focus on the weight of PACK CONTENTS only we might get a more useful conversation. And we might get a greater unanimity in what we carry.
And gain an understanding that each of us will always have something that others won't need, but may envy).
Like my 0.8 kg two person tent (including poles, pegs and air mattress), or @Kiwi-family who will carry her father-in-laws gear (as well as her own) or @SYates who (if I recall correctly) includes her very weighty DSLR camera.
It was Shakespeare who had a Princess of France observe "Beauty is bought by judgement of the eye" (Loves Labours Lost, 1588). Or one Margaret Wolfe Hungerford who wrote "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder" (Mally Bawm, 1878). In our case replace "beauty" with "weight".
Well, not really. There are a number of factors that skew any weight comparisons, including what can be marked variations in what might or might not be included as worn items rather than including them in the packed load. I remember an early discussion on this where a forum member was suggesting that he was only carrying a few kilograms. It transpired that to achieve this, he was wearing fleece, rain jacket and rain pants and not counting them in his pack weight. One way of avoiding this dissembling is to use the FSO approach, where absolutely everything is counted. It is the only reliable and consistent way of testing various weight claims that people make. Pack weight alone clearly does not do that.I don't weigh the worn clothes - I can't see the logic in this FSO concept - we wear our clothes anyway, it's the extra carried weight that counts, surely.
...Craghoppers zip off pants - I don't wear them as shorts ... if the bottoms get muddy, easier to wash than the whole set...
I've been doing a lot of research re: long-distance hiking and walking, and this is the first time someone has pointed out this convenience - brilliant!
With a safari gilet you can do pockets only with ease.i have often mused over this exact thing myself. There is a caveat though.time of year.Well, I was actually hoping for some input from anyone who had reduced their stuff down to "pockets only".
As stated, I have walked 2 caminos already with minimum (2.5kilos) gear, and as an intellectual, and hopefully, practical exercise, am planning to carry even less.
I will post my 2.5kg list next - right now loads of other stuff to do
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?