Telluridewalker
Active Member
- Time of past OR future Camino
- Camino Frances (1988)
Remove ads on the forum by becoming a donating member. More here. |
---|
JohnnieWalker said:JW being served dinner through the bars in an enclosed convent on the Camino Levante - not a word was spoken!
JohnnieWalker said:JW being served dinner through the bars in an enclosed convent on the Camino Levante - not a word was spoken!
Telluridewalker said:Thanks, all, for the responses.
@JW- are you serious about the silent, through-the-bars-meal?
I don't know what that is supposed to mean. You disagree with some comments, but label them in a derogatory way because your opinion is superior? Isn't it a bit politically correct to label something "politically correct?" It is the new practice of not actually responding to the question at hand, but trying to win a point with ad hominum argument.Please stop with the political correctness.
JohnnieWalker said:Errrr...what did you do with all that extra weight Andy?
Then, I know some that I would dodge moving traffic to cross the street to greet.Tio Huero said:sisters....cross the street if I see one coming my way.
Yes, maybe we need a thread dedicated to lame humour.+@^^ said:slightly off-topic.....
KiwiNomad06 said:In Spain I only struck one place that had sleeping dorms divided by gender- in a very central albergue in Leon run by nuns in a convent.
Margaret
He must have smelt me coming, 18 years before I arrived!Rebekah Scott said:when I first encountered this Camino thing back in 1993...a dirty man smells a lot more nasty than a dirty woman!
hubris from Carl BeckerLike most men I hold certain cherished beliefs which I think valid because they follow logically from known and obvious facts. It often distresses me to find than an intimate friend of mine rejects one or other of these beliefs, even after I have laid before him all the relevant facts and have repeatedly retraced for his benefit the logical steps that ought to convince a reasonable mind. It may happen (is almost sure to, in fact) that he cannot refute my arguments. No matter. Convinced against his will, he is of the same opinion still; and I realize at last that his mind is, unfortunately, no entirely open. Some perverse emotion, some deep-seated prejudice or unexamined preconception blinds him to the truth.
The disturbing prejudice which leads my friend to wrong conclusions I readily forgive because I understand it. It is a minor error into which I myself, but for the grace of some happy chance, might have fallen.
Smallest_Sparrow said:I believe the OP's question was were there places on the Camino besides the one she mentioned that refused to allow pilgrims refuge based on gender. I believe we have established that the monks in question were the only ones to do that, that it is not a religious issue as similarly (or even more so as illustrated by Falcon's post) restricted members of the same religion do not discriminate based on gender, and it is rude to minimize the concern/question of the OP who makes a valid point. The facts are simply the facts, it is not criticizing the monks, simply stating the truth that other religious in a similar or more restrictive order welcome pilgrims regardless of gender. The monks do not.
Fancy suggesting we have fun, and not telling us where to go to find it! The Rule of St Benedict can be found at this site -->> http://www.osb.org/rb/. There are various translations at the links.renegadepilgrim said:snip
If you want to have fun, read the Rule of St. Benedict. It might give you a little insight onto why they do the things they do. While Benedictines are known for their hospitality, it is also within reason to expect limitations on that hospitality, especially in this world we live in, and especially for the monastery in question, which grew quite famous after their CD release in the 1990's.
renegadepilgrim said:especially in this world we live in, and especially for the monastery in question, which grew quite famous after their CD release in the 1990's.
Telluridewalker said:On another thread, it was mentioned that the monastery at Santo Domingo de Silos only hosts men overnight. Is this true? And are there other refugios/albergues that bar a stay based on sex? Just curious. :?:
Smallest_Sparrow said:I have read the Rule, in this case 53 applies: Omnes supervenientes hospites tamquam Christus suscipiantur, quia ipse dicturus est: Hospis fui et suscepistis me. Et omnibus congruus honor exhibeatur, maxime domesticis fidei et peregrinis...Pauperum et peregrinorum maxime susceptioni cura sollicite exhibeatur, quia in ipsis magis Christus suscipitur; nam divitum terror ipse sibi exigit honorem.
I recognise the discrimination (again, unknot panties, read the definition) but it doesn't bother me. what does bother me is people who "quote" sources they haven't read in order to justify their own limited knowledge. there is actually nothing in the Rule, any of the caputs, regarding opposite genders. And if the reason to prevent temptation, then it really should be males prevented from staying if we are to judge by the news and the law suits.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?