Remove ads on the forum by becoming a donating member. More here. |
---|
@davebugg many thanks for that. I wish I could just buy the 2E here... there are other New Balance shoes available but I'm not convinced on the traction of the other models... they are more road runners? Thanks for the good tip about the older version thanks... it can offset some of the shipping costs
@kirkie I have previously looked at Meindl but they dont have a wide fit... they do a comfort fit? I've emailed them. I think I prefer a more light weight shoe but I'll try anything if it means I dont end up with half a dozen blisters between my toes
Alternatively, I could ship shoes to a friend in the US, who can ship to me... it's not a cheap option and if they don't fit I have to pay to ship them back. So has anyone with wide feet tried any of the following?
New Balance Vazee Summit Trail v2 (wide)
New Balance 910v4 Trail (wide)
Men's Moab FST - Wide Width
The word on the thru-hiker (AT &PCT) forums is that the Alta Lone Peak 3.5 is shorter than the earlier 3.0 model, due chiefly to reduced height in the toe box. Supposedly they used the same last for the width, but people report having to "size up" because of the way the toe box slopes downward towards the tip.Altra Lone Peak 3.5 is now available in europe. Should I go with this? Has anyone tried the new version of the shoe? Is it cut smaller than the 3.0?
Amen, Brutha Dave!All of the answers point to an undying truth with shoes: every person can have such unique requirements, that recommendations can only be viewed as a loose guidance rather than a gospel standard.
I think New Balance is phasing out the Leadville v3. I was able to get a pair from amazon, but returned them after I got my Altra Olympus. I had to go up 1.5 sizes in the Olympus. At first I thought they were way too big. But, after I put my insoles, liner socks, and socks they felt great. They have a wide toe box. I have lace locked them (last couple of eyelets), or used lock laces (elastic) to eliminate heel slippage. They do have a little deeper heel cup / back than the NB Leadville had. They are super cushioned. They do look a little funky.Altra Olympus (too small and too narrow)
- (Altra Lone Peak not available in France so I asked Altra and they suggested I go up a size with the Olympus...)
- Altra Olympus too big!
The word on the thru-hiker (AT &PCT) forums is that the Alta Lone Peak 3.5 is shorter than the earlier 3.0 model, due chiefly to reduced height in the toe box. Supposedly they used the same last for the width, but people report having to "size up" because of the way the toe box slopes downward towards the tip.
@LesBrass : I sympathise with you. I too have wide feet and combined with pes cavus aka high arch ( and also hallux valgus or bunion ).
Since a couple of years I found myself the best shoes for me : Hanwag.
They have them in shoe or boot form.
The inside feels like stepping in butter...so soft and smooth...
They do not come cheap...I nearly cried when I took out my bankcard...
http://www.hanwag.com/alta-bunion-lady-gtxa
Stores in France.
http://www.hanwag.com/storelocator/
Good luck with the search.
I think New Balance is phasing out the Leadville v3. I was able to get a pair from amazon, but returned them after I got my Altra Olympus. I had to go up 1.5 sizes in the Olympus. At first I thought they were way too big. But, after I put my insoles, liner socks, and socks they felt great. They have a wide toe box. I have lace locked them (last couple of eyelets), or used lock laces (elastic) to eliminate heel slippage. They do have a little deeper heel cup / back than the NB Leadville had. They are super cushioned. They do look a little funky.
I have altra lone peak 3.0 and about a month ago bought the 3.5. I think the fit is different on the 3.5 and I don't like them. I leave in less than a week and still deciding between Altra lone peak 3.0 and Saucony Peregrine 6. I get foot pain with either (hallux rigidis) but will still walk. I will probably go with the Saucony since I wore them for Camino Francés last year.
Ah... that is what worried. I think I will order 2 sizes and try. Interesting when I wrote to Altra they said no difference but they also told me to buy the other two pairs (is feels like a good sales technique!)
many thanks
Quack quack, another duck here! I love my Altra Lone Peaks. I wear the men's version, as it is wider than the women's. What kind of foot pain do you get? I
I WISH Altra would make the Olympus as wide and roomy as the Lone Peak. Someone mentioned that the new 3.5 Lone Peak is shorter than the 3.0. I recommend looking on their website, because as soon as they come out with a new model, they sell the last model at steep discounts. I just bought the 3.0 Lone Peak on sale through them.
I feel your pain, they stop making women's shoes well before they reach my clod hopping size and I've long brought mine from the mens wear section. As an aside why are there male and female shoes anyway, is there some thing about feet that I am missing here? Likewise how come men's clothes come with pockets and have sleaves that can accomodate shoulders and a bit of arm muscle but women's clothes can deal with neither.Finding a shoe to fit my very wide feet is a punishment... at least that's how it feels. It's a long story... some of you might be familiar with it... (all of these shoes are a man's shoe)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?