falcon269 said:
Everyone has their reasons for selecting footwear!
I hope I'm not pushing my luck on this matter--there are certainly solid, legitimate reasons people would use footwear that I wouldn't use--but I do believe that a lot of people who might have selected their footwear didn't really have good reasons for it. Those companies that create hiking boots, I believe, have done a pretty good job of brainwashing people into thinking they need more shoe than is really necessary, and it costs them in pain and blisters.
So please don't get me wrong--I'm not suggesting that heavy-duty hiking boots are wrong for everyone! For some people, they might be the right chose! But there are a lot of people walking on the Camino for which they are not the right choice but were probably purchased because they thought it was the right choice.
I image someone who's never walked more than five miles in a day in their life walking into an REI to buy some shoes. They know they're going to do 500 miles--which sounds HUGE! And, I suppose, in a way, it is, and the first time I did it, it felt HUGE! I've now since thru-hiked the Pacific Crest Trail, Appalachian Trail, and Florida Trail, and when I decided to hike the Camino last year, I looked at the 500 miles from Saint Jean to Santiago and thought, "Yeah, only 500 miles? That's not really very much..." It's all relative. =) That also explains why I chose to start in Le Puy instead of Saint Jean--and why I originally wanted to do the Portuguese route on top of that. (I ultimately cut out the Portuguese section only because I didn't have a visa and it would have required my "racing" to complete within 90 days--and I wanted to take my time.)
Anyhow.... That first thru-hike I did back on the Appalachian Trail, I remember the enormous sense of accomplishment I felt at reaching the 100-mile mark. Looking back on it, I kind of laugh at the thought. But at the time, it felt HUGE!
And I could totally understand the feeling that if you're doing a walk that long for the first time, you feel the need to get a "real" hiking boot. Something heavy duty that can go the distance. I didn't actually do that, though--I wore sneakers along the AT. (And through the swamps of the Florida Trail, and through the snows of the High Sierras.) And they tended to last me about 500-700 miles just fine. (They weren't even expensive ones--I bought them at Payless Shoes!) And those trails were a heck of a lot rougher and tougher on my feet than the Camino.
But I think a lot of people look at sneakers and think, "Yeah, those aren't going to hold up for 500 miles!" But they can, and do. Consequently, you wind up with a lot of people walking in boots far heavier than needed--but only because they didn't know any better.
For those who have certain medical issues or weak ankles or something, there very well could be a good reason for a heavier hiking boot. But if the main reason people are buying a heavy duty hiking boot is because "they're on a long trail," that's not a good reason for it and they'll likely be doing their feet a huge favor by getting lightweight walking shoes. They need people to tell them that it's okay not to have a hiking boot if for no other reason than so many people tell them that they DO need such shoes.
Anyhow, I'll keep my trap shut on the matter now. I've said my peace. =)
-- Ryan