I finished this last week after struggling to get to the end asking myself why I am I reading this?
First of all the good. It is generally well written and from Porto he provides a perfectly acceptable Camino narrative but with some caveats (see below).
Secondly the bad. He desperately seems to wants to be WB Yeats or Brendan Behan and he isn't. Early on there is an embarrassingly mediocre diversion into sub-Hemingway cliche regurgitation about Southern Spain and its culture, down to the mandatory foreigner at the bullfight section. In hindsight this suggested that he struggled to get a full book out of the CP. There is a bizarrely Chauncey Gardeneresque attempt to portray events in the story of Santiago as being literal (Memo to the author. Whatever language the apostles spoke it wasn't bl**dy Latin). He clearly fought some demons on the CF but the problem is that he expects us to know what these were. He now seems to be engaged on a frantic search for lost faith in the symbolism of grass roots catholicism. He laments his exclusion from community whilst appearing to despise both modernity and tradition in equal measure. The book's conclusion wants to offer some sense of closure but I wasn't convinced.
Lastly the ugly. As far as Porto the book is an endless series of miseries from his feet, the way and the Portugal he passes through. There is nothing memorable and given the choice I would have plumped even for the egregious Piper for a companion. Cities like Coimbra and Tomar are brushed aside as the author looks for the negative in every situation.
Anyway enough. Sister Rupp climbs to the relative safety of mid-table amongst Camino memoirs, whilst Mr McGranaghan fights it out for the wooden spoon with the Antipodean luvvie.
If you see graffiti on the way that says "Please promise you're not writing a book". That will be me.
Hello,
I was the author of this travel memoir.
Now, let me make it clear: You are indeed free to dislike whatever you like. I’ve zero problem if you did not like the book.
It’s worth pointing out that I didn’t write this memoir with anyone in mind, but as a challenge to myself to get it on paper before I forgot all about it. It was fun to put together a book for sale, and that’s that.
(Try it yourself, if you have the stamina and confidence. You you’ll enjoy it.)
However, there is a teachable moment here that would be of benefit to those of us who have written ‘Camino Memoirs’, and those who read them: The suggestion that someone walk the Camino writing ‘no more books’ is pathetic. Nobody has put a gun to your head and forced you to read any Camino memoir – mine or that of anyone else. If you dislike such reflections, don’t read them. It’s as simple as that.
If you read them and dislike them, fine. We have all bought and read books we did not enjoy. It’s all part of growing up. But this is not Twitter, so
Ipse Venena Bibas.
As a last word on this, I feel that the attitude displayed on this thread reinforces my original take on the Camino experience as an ‘Ego Trip’. The worst hikers, indeed some of the worst people, I have ever met have been on the Camino [myself included]. Perhaps those of you who consider the Camino to be your personal property ought to let it go. No offence intended, but you are doing yourselves a disservice by turning a hiking holiday into a golden calf.
So, that was the attention you ordered, now
Buen Camino and get a life.