- Time of past OR future Camino
- To Santiago and back. Le Puy to Aumont-Aubrac.
Remove ads on the forum by becoming a donating member. More here. |
---|
Although I am not certain what the function of this door in the photo of the Burgos albergue Casa del Cubo is and going only by what I think I see in the photo, I thought I’d share this newly acquired bit of info as it might be useful to know in general:And the sign on the door saying that you need to push with both hands to open it?
This "fire triangle" is very interesting for me to learn of, @Bristle Boy. Although I have enjoyed reading of everyone's personal experiences staying in the albergues, the posts that stand out to me are the few such as yours; where professional training in preventing fires, along with the various hospi's experiences; both carry the most weight for me.I had to undergo annual fire courses and training with regard to my employment. The importance of escape cannot be over emphasised. An appreciation of the "fire triangle" is also helpful, this being point of ignition, fuel (in the form of combustible material) and oxygen. Deprive a fire of any of these and you don't have a fire.
I stayed there a couple of weeks ago. I avoided the wack on the head however it felt like sleeping in a submarine. It was the only place open in winter so I was grateful for small merciesI stayed in a place in Ages, that made me really nervous. Apart from the glass shower door that fell off and hit me on the head and gave me an 'egg', there were so many bunks shoved in a room you could barely get down from the top bunk, as the other one was so close. The stairs were treacherous, and there were bars on the windows. I could just imagine the carnage if a fire broke out.
Regarding smoke alarms in Europe--this is a reply regarding Portugal rather than Spain, and strictly anecdotal but may be relevant, if EU and/or Iberian attitudes are standard...Recently in our home state, new fire and safety regulations have come into law for all short term rental accommodation. The main impetus has been the rise of Airbnb in recent years, with people offering private dwellings which didn’t have the same compliance as motels and hotels etc. Without compliance and a corresponding registration number, the property can no longer be listed with an agent or other online rental platform.
I know Albergues are not rental properties but the relevance - the three most important safety items now required are 1) smoke alarms, 2 ) evacuation diagrams in each room and 3) no key locks on the inside of doors, e.g. you can’t have people scrambling to find a key in the case of a fire. So the door has to be openable with a turn of a handle, flip of a lever or similar. The diagrams can be hand drawn as long as the layout is accurate and clearly show the exit in case of emergency
These items are relatively inexpensive. One or more of them could go a long way to improving safety, if it’s something individual Albergues were prepared to consider.
Same here: As a skipper, I have had to take safety courses, including fire prevention and handling, health and life saving, panic control and handling, etc., regularly.I had to undergo annual fire courses and training with regard to my employment. The importance of escape cannot be over emphasised. An appreciation of the "fire triangle" is also helpful, this being point of ignition, fuel (in the form of combustible material) and oxygen. Deprive a fire of any of these and you don't have a fire.
You are of course correct, but it is also in the fire triangle, as the element of heat. Heat may come from many sources, and what you correctly point out is one of them. Other sources are unattended cooking, drying socks/clothes on electric/wooden heaters, or other stupid behaviours.A brief add on to the fire triangle if I may. There is a fourth side to consider and that is chemical reaction. It is not part of the model but is an extra consideration where heat from an external source is not required.
For example a pile of linseed oiled rags if left alone can ignite in the absence of an external source of heat. This is known as spontaneous ignition or spontaneous combustion. The heat is chemically generated by the materials present to reach above the ignition temp for the rags and the pile will ignite if enough oxygen is present.
This happens in certain agricultural and laboratory environments as well.
It is taught in the fire service as part of the triangle of fire.
Cheers
Edit: I have not heard of any fires in albergues so far, but they are bound to happen one day.
Thanks. So, already happended. And will happen again.Check post #4 in this thread.
I have certainly been guilty of this a number of times on the Camino after arriving at albergues in cold, damp, or rainy weather, and at the time was thankful...I won't be doing that again.drying socks/clothes on electric/wooden heaters
Sometimes that was an option, sometimes not. The heaters were used when only outside clotheslines were the only option in inclement weather.The best thing is for the hospitalero to put out some drying racks in a room with some heat.
wooden heaters, or other stupid behaviours.
Wooden heaters are wood stoves; metal on the outside, with burning wood stoked on the inside, but I love your pun @chinacat.Isn’t a “wooden heater” as much use as a chocolate teapot?
Wooden heaters are wood stoves; metal on the outside, with burning wood stoked on the inside, but I love your pun @chinacat.
I loved you sharing your personal little story.I grew up rescuing my mother from various kitchen fires …
Also, what's the use of a hot water heater?Isn’t a “wooden heater” as much use as a chocolate teapot?
I think that the real benefit of this thread is to raise awareness of fire safety as an issue to pay attention to in albergues and other accommodation on the Camino. Whether this albergue or that albergue really locks people in over night is, IMO, not as important as the fact that I need to pay attention when I arrive at any albergue to make sure there is a good exit strategy. It’s something that had never been on my radar screen.
You are quite right in your resume..the only comment I would make is that the practice (in some cases and for the best of reasons) of locking a point of access also restricts a point of egress in the eventuality if fire is experienced.I think that the real benefit of this thread is to raise awareness of fire safety as an issue to pay attention to in albergues and other accommodation on the Camino. Whether this albergue or that albergue really locks people in over night is, IMO, not as important as the fact that I need to pay attention when I arrive at any albergue to make sure there is a good exit strategy. It’s something that had never been on my radar screen.
As a homeowner I have warning mechanisms in place but no extinguishers (although I have thought of it). I also have a "duty of care" to anyone I invite into my home/property.
Thank you.I keep two different types of fire extinguisher in the house (upstairs) … and keep them up-to-date … and another small one in the car.
And smoke alarms, of course. (Carbon monoxide alarms too.)
I’m relatively fire conscious: we live in an old building.
But, although I used to check youth hostels, b and b stays, and hotels etc. and made sure tents had two exits, it didn’t occur to me to consider the dangers in albergues.
I wish I knew why not …
I wonder if it has anything to do with the unique nature of pilgrimage?
There is, after all, a certain amount of ‘trust’ involved in taking on a long journey on foot, in a land where many of us are not familiar with the language, and where we may not always be confident in easily finding a bed for the night.
One can also find many other ‘unknowns’ eg some female pilgrims walking alone, dangers from traffic, health concerns to name a few.
Many of us set out with more than the usual amount of trust that we automatically assume in our everyday lives.
I’m not suggesting that any are careless for our own (and others’) safety when we walk but so many of us seem not to have thought much about this risk until this thread appeared.
I have thought about this a lot over the course of this thread, and I am inclined to say that you are right: it is partly "trust" as you say...I keep two different types of fire extinguisher in the house (upstairs) … and keep them up-to-date … and another small one in the car.
And smoke alarms, of course. (Carbon monoxide alarms too.)
I’m relatively fire conscious: we live in an old building.
But, although I used to check youth hostels, b and b stays, and hotels etc. and made sure tents had two exits, it didn’t occur to me to consider the dangers in albergues.
I wish I knew why not …
I wonder if it has anything to do with the unique nature of pilgrimage?
There is, after all, a certain amount of ‘trust’ involved in taking on a long journey on foot, in a land where many of us are not familiar with the language, and where we may not always be confident in easily finding a bed for the night.
One can also find many other ‘unknowns’ eg some female pilgrims walking alone, dangers from traffic, health concerns to name a few.
Many of us set out with more than the usual amount of trust that we automatically assume in our everyday lives.
I’m not suggesting that any are careless for our own (and others’) safety when we walk but so many of us seem not to have thought much about this risk until this thread appeared.
This would be another topic for volunteer hospitaleros to get acquainted with if this is not done on the basis of protocol: Are there legal requirements to comply with as to the maximum numbers of pilgrims who can stay. From what I've read, it sounded as if regional administrations require albergues to display a notice where the maximum number of occupants is shown. Again: Not a question of philosophy and compassion but a question of compliance with public safety rules if there is such an obligation.Happy am I to sleep in very modest conditions, but I've also learned (as have others) to walk on from what does not feel right for me, and from what is *obviously* unsafe (for me: that's crowding).
Agreed...This would be another topic for volunteer hospitaleros to get acquainted with if this is not done on the basis of protocol: Are there legal requirements to comply with as to the maximum numbers of pilgrims who can stay. From what I've read, it sounded as if regional administrations require albergues to display a notice where the maximum number of occupants is shown. Again: Not a question of philosophy and compassion but a question of compliance with public safety rules if there is such an obligation.
In Roncesvalles there are three big doors in the corridor downstairs and one door in the basement (near the laundry), which are all closed by the hospitaleros at 22.00 am. Not wit a key, they are simply closed for people who want to come in from outside, but can always be opened from inside. The same counts for the doors in the winter-albergue.A first step would be to find out to what extent this is even an issue. When the door is locked by hospitaleros, what does it mean. Do they look the door with a key and remove the key? Put the key on a hook next to the door? How is this done at Roncesvalles for example, a large albergue where many forum members have stayed or been hospitaleros. I would think that they have procedures to follow?
Hi @Ianinam, I was hoping that you would see the thread and provide information. Thank you! I think the renovation of the building where the albergue of Roncesvalles is was finished in 2011 or so? Also good to hear that the volunteer hospitaleros are made familiar with the evacuation plan and equipment at the start of their 2-week stay.In Roncesvalles there are [...]
Absolutely true. But it is also pretty clear that a locked door will quite effectively block a route if that door is not openable. So if all egresses are locked (for example, to ensure that no pilgrims leave too early and everyone gets a good sleep, which I've heard happens in some albergues) then there is no unblocked emergency route.I don't think that we will find a rule that says you must not lock doors. The rules usually say something along the lines that there must be a plan for emergency routes and that these routes must not be blocked.
If there were a fire you cannot choose where an outbreak occurs. There could be the possibility that your egress from an albergue (or whatever premise) to a designated fire exit was blocked. The main door to a premise would then be your fire exit. To have that locked is an accident waiting to happen.Absolutely true. But it is also pretty clear that a locked door will quite effectively block a route if that door is not openable. So if all egresses are locked (for example, to ensure that no pilgrims leave too early and everyone gets a good sleep, which I've heard happens in some albergues) then there is no unblocked emergency route.
on the subject of importance in a get a way, The Auberge in Sahagun operated by the Benedictine Sisters is of concern. I stayed there about four years ago and a French lady wanted to leave early but was unable we had been locked inside. I don't know whether this has changed but it is of concern. Mine you it is a great place to other than the locked in.This very sad news just stresses once again how important it is for peregrinos to make sure about emergency exits in albergues.
Destruido por un incendio el albergue 'El Refugio' de La Faba
Las labores de extinción se centran en evitar la propagación a otros inmuebles debido a la inestabilidad de las estructuras del edificiowww.elbierzodigital.com
This report reminded me of our recent discussion about fire safety in albergues.
Thankfully the building was not occupied at the time of the fire.
It is not locked from the inside. Please double check your source before spreading rumours. Having been hospitalera at Santa Cruz, I know the facts.on the subject of importance in a get a way, The Auberge in Sahagun operated by the Benedictine Sisters is of concern. I stayed there about four years ago and a French lady wanted to leave early but was unable we had been locked inside. I don't know whether this has changed but it is of concern. Mine you it is a great place to other than the locked in.
It is not locked from the inside. Please double check your source before spreading rumours. Having been hospitalera at Santa Cruz, I know the facts.
@IngridF, since fire safety is a topic of concern for pilgrims, could you perhaps explain a bit more, either here or, perhaps better, in the thread about Fire Safety in Albergues? Are pilgrims locked into the building in Sahagun where you were a hospitalera or would they be locked into the cloister's grounds, as it appears from the linked 2015 thread, and if so, would that be still a safety issue in case of a fire or is it more a "we pilgrims can't leave when we want to" issue?It is not locked from the inside. Please double check your source before spreading rumours. Having been hospitalera at Santa Cruz, I know the facts.
Walking the Frances in 2015 and again in 2017 I have stayed almost exclusively in albergues, and stayed in a few on other Caminos, as well. I do not recall even one instance when I was informed of any emergency exits, or that we would be fully locked in all night long.in numerous cases, pilgrims are not informed about the exits (and their mechanism) that do exist and that they can take in an emergency.
A quick response: the albergue is locked by levers easily pulled down to open the door from the inside whilst preventing entry after curfew. Santa Cruz, in 2019 when I was hospitalera was staffed with 1 hospi for the night. The priests do not stay at the albergue overnight. Recalling a few stragglers (mostly Spanish, they do love to party into the wee hours) and me putting up my frowning demeanor when woken in the middle of the night to let them in.@IngridF, since fire safety is a topic of concern for pilgrims, could you perhaps explain a bit more, either here or, perhaps better, in the thread about Fire Safety in Albergues? Are pilgrims locked into the building in Sahagun where you were a hospitalera or would they be locked into the cloister's grounds, as it appears from the linked 2015 thread, and if so, would that be still a safety issue in case of a fire or is it more a "we pilgrims can't leave when we want to" issue?
I've taken a bit of an interest in the topic, and I have even emailed one association who manages a well-known large albergue and from all this I get the impression that, in numerous cases, pilgrims are not informed about the exits (and their mechanism) that do exist and that they can take in an emergency.
That explains the confusion and the different statements about fire safety. Before 2017, the albergue was run by the sisters. This was what Rebekah described in the post I linked to above, and presumably what @nathanael remembers.I have no insight to what the rules are at the convent for the nuns.
I think Ingrid was saying in the passage that you quote that it is not locked from the inside. If that is the case none of the options you provide above (Are pilgrims locked into the building in Sahagun where you were a hospitalera or would they be locked into the cloister's grounds, as it appears from the linked 2015 thread, and if so, would that be still a safety issue in case of a fire or is it more a "we pilgrims can't leave when we want to" issue?) are applicable.@IngridF, since fire safety is a topic of concern for pilgrims, could you perhaps explain a bit more, either here or, perhaps better, in the thread about Fire Safety in Albergues? Are pilgrims locked into the building in Sahagun where you were a hospitalera or would they be locked into the cloister's grounds, as it appears from the linked 2015 thread, and if so, would that be still a safety issue in case of a fire or is it more a "we pilgrims can't leave when we want to" issue?
I've taken a bit of an interest in the topic, and I have even emailed one association who manages a well-known large albergue and from all this I get the impression that, in numerous cases, pilgrims are not informed about the exits (and their mechanism) that do exist and that they can take in an emergency.
Smoke detectors need to be hard-wired with fire-proof cabling etc. They need to be installed and certified by a qualified electrician. Most buildings must have fire-routes and exits where doors open outwards, though there may be exceptions for historic buildings. It's not as simple as just buying a couple of lights off Amazon.@BombayBill Smoke detectors and emergency exit lights are not very expensive and can be added to any room easily - I don't really see how that would warrant a massive increase in prices? An exit light is like 30€ on amazon and smoke detectors cost even less... I'm no expert, though, maybe commercial places need special certified ones that are more expensive?
If 'normal' smoke detectors like the ones you can buy for your own home would be acceptable, it would be easy to buy them and donate to favourite albergues that don't have them yet.
I think the first thing to do is to talk to the albergue owner or manager to find out whether there really is no emergency plan and not a single emergency exit that can be used in case of a fire to get out. Some comments in forum threads refer to stays that happened many years ago, others are not accurate.My question was who would one report this to?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?