Remove ads on the forum by becoming a donating member. More here. |
---|
This is the easy way to analyse the circumstance, although the original post does not suggest permission was given, rather that a work around was pointed out. If you do analyse the problem this way, there is still a problem with the post. That is that the OP has no authority to give such permission, and to suggest that this is a legitimate workaround is inappropriate.Anniesantiago said:librarian gave you permission
Annie, you are right, we wouldn't do this, and in the circumstances Laurie found herself in, I think I might have taken it for permission as well. It's only when one has time to reflect on this that it becomes clearer that this might not be as simple as it seems.Anniesantiago said:If the caretaker of the broken lock door told me I could go in and I wanted to go in, I would go on in.
I wouldn't double triple check if he had authority.
I brought an iPhone, which is great for Skyping home or answering short emails, but I just can´t write long passages on that tiny keyboard.
jeffnd said:I don't know about blogger, but wordpress allows you to update your blog via email.
Rather than installing Chrome onto the library's computer, you could install a portable version of Chrome onto a usb drive, that way nothing is downloaded onto the computer itself.
peregrina2000 said:I recognize that some of the critical emails may have had some valid concerns to express, but what was upsetting to me was the sanctimonious tone and the accusation that somehow I am disrespectful of Spain and its laws and customs.
The issue being addressed is an ethical question, not a matter of morality - sanctimonious is a completely inappropriate word in that context.alansykes said:peregrina2000 said:I recognize that some of the critical emails may have had some valid concerns to express, but what was upsetting to me was the sanctimonious tone and the accusation that somehow I am disrespectful of Spain and its laws and customs.
"Sanctimonious" is indeed the right word to use, and possibly also "hectoring" and "judgemental".
The issue being addressed is an ethical question, not a matter of morality - sanctimonious is a completely inappropriate word in that context.alansykes said:peregrina2000 said:I recognize that some of the critical emails may have had some valid concerns to express, but what was upsetting to me was the sanctimonious tone and the accusation that somehow I am disrespectful of Spain and its laws and customs.
"Sanctimonious" is indeed the right word to use, and possibly also "hectoring" and "judgemental".
dougfitz said:What might be a better approach would be to seek the approval of someone who is entitled to give permission to run non-approved applications.
Regard
Doug
Kiwi-family said:dougfitz said:What might be a better approach would be to seek the approval of someone who is entitled to give permission to run non-approved applications.
Regard
Doug
Doug, if a librarian gives me permission to do something in a library, I consider him/her to be "someone who is entitled" to give such approval.
...
I just think you're going to find it's you-against-the-rest-of-the-world on this one.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?