Re: WHERE TO STOP?
perhaps we should start a new thread for this!
Pilgrim said:
I wrote my 'WHERE TO BEGIN?' piece partly to explain to those who had read my 'FEVER IN THE BLOOD' article why I was starting where I was
If your aim is to follow in the footsteps of medieval pilgrims from Britain, starting in Porto is entirely plausible. English (and to some extent Scottish) merchants settled in both Porto and Viana (centre of the wine trade until the C17) more or less from when Portugal split off from Galicia in the C11-C12. They even signed their own commercial treaty with Edward III. So it's entirely possible that some pilgrims to Compostela hitched a ride with a trading ship bound for N Portugal and walked from there.
Pilgrim said:
and not going the 'whole way'.
My point would be that 'going the whole way' doesn't necessarily involve much walking. Paradoxically, although Britain (and other countries on the Atlantic seaboard) is a long way from Galicia, you do not need to walk very far to get there. In medieval times, you went to your nearest port, and if you lived in a port, as many did, that was not very arduous. Even if you didn't, few people lived more than a day or two's walk away. If your ship went to a Galician port, such as Corunna, you will have only had a couple of day's walk to Santiago. And if there'd been a navigable river to Santiago, we can be sure the ships would have gone directly there. Flying from Stansted to Santiago seems to me to be the modern equivalent of this.
Pilgrim said:
There was a secondary purpose however, which I could, 'tongue in cheek', call an attack upon 'Camino Guide Book tyranny'. I accept that guides to the route have existed ever since the Codex was published and that they serve a useful purpose for all, including me. I do feel however that they give rise to the sort of idea that the Camino has a specific route and only that route.
yes, it seems to be a feature of anything related to religion that before long the dogmatists move in with their rule-books: you must do this, that and the other, or you're not a proper Christian/Muslim/Jew/pilgrim. Not that the dogmatists all have the same rule-book: "oh, the true pilgrim doesn't walk the
Camino Frances any more; much too crowded - full of people who don't understand what pilgrimage is [i.e. don't follow my rules]". And I'm afraid far too many of the modern guidebooks are simply me-too publishing, trotting out the same old things with little original thought.
Pilgrim said:
The existance of the Compostela 'demanding' the last 100km of walking must play a part in this.
the problem with this is it's a completely arbitrary number. People who walk from Sarria, a place of no historical or religious significance whatsoever, are somehow pilgrims and can be given a certificate in Latin and a mention in a mass, whereas those who follow the many thousands of yore on the English Road from Corunna are somehow not pilgrims. Take it to its logical conclusion and disabled people or others who are not able to walk 100km are somehow not pilgrims - not a conclusion I can sign up to.
Pilgrim said:
Pilgrimage is, I think, travelling with a true spirit.
A hip flask, you mean
As someone who's been following the development of the Camino for 25 years now, I am fascinated (in fact, rather bemused) by the way it has changed from being a rather obscure part of European history known to a handful of academics and walked by a handful of eccentrics to something that seems to affect and bring meaning to so many people. I'm also intrigued by the way this explosion of interest in the Camino and in pilgrimage (whatever that might be) has coincided with a dramatic decline in more conventional religious observance in Spain.