- Time of past OR future Camino
- Inglès April 2023
Primitivo July 2023
Remove ads on the forum by becoming a donating member. More here. |
---|
Sadly this is a very emotive topic for some.I am confused and not attempting to cause further annoyance ....but what is the difference between riding an electric power "bike" and a petrol powered "bike" to travel a Camino route?
It seems that there is a tiny bit of acceptance (not compostela) but not anyone making a case for gas power.
Is there actually a higher acceptance of one mode of power over the other?
So by your standards if, God forbid (just to remind the scalp hunters of the origins of a pilgrimage), your spinal cord is severely damaged then you cannot use an electric wheelchair, or an e-Trike, perhaps an e-Bike (with less power than many wheelchairs), to complete your camino on a shared trail (very little is pedestrian only, and nothing is restricted for the chronically disabled). Note that much of the trail is used by local cycling groups, randonneurs and farmers tending their fields.I think If you do it by horse, the horse should get the Compostela!
What's the real difference between an E bike and a moped? Degree? If you let the E-bikes get a Compostela, then you really have let any motorized vehicle.
The terminology is not uniform, hence the confusion.I am confused and not attempting to cause further annoyance ....but what is the difference between riding an electric power "bike" and a petrol powered "bike" to travel a Camino route?
It seems that there is a tiny bit of acceptance (not compostela) but not anyone making a case for gas power.
Well, this scalp hunter has no power to veto anything. It's just my opinion.So if, God forbid (just to remind the scalp hunters of the origins of a pilgrimage), your spinal cord is severely damaged then you cannot use an electric wheelchair, or an e-Trike, perhaps an e-Bike (with less power than many wheelchairs), to complete your camino if you choose on a shared trail (very little is pedestrian only, and nothing is restricted for the chronically disabled). Further, if the Church considers your injuries sufficient to warrant that mode of transport, the scalp hunters have the power of veto? Really? I think some contributors need to inwardly reflect on why they are doing another camino.
Then the camino will have less congestion. Make way for the first-timers … perhaps resemble the attitude of the 70’s?
Or, perhaps the able-bodied shoes get the Compostela, since they carried them. Of note, some disabled will complete the return route as well. Mine starts near La Rochelle, Nouvelle Aquitaine. The rules for e-Bikes in France are some of the most draconian in Europe (thank goodness).Well this scalp hunter has no power to veto anything. It's just my opinion.
Of course if you're disabled, I would support special dispensation.
But for those without disabilities, no e-bikes or powered anything. I wasn't completely joking, I do think the horse should get the Compostela.
That's where the "traditional method" comes into play ... people sometimes argue that riding a horse is physically demanding. But (pure guessing on my behalf) that's not the point. Traditional pilgrims of yore did travel to Santiago on horseback and traditional pilgrims of yore did travel by non-motorised ships to Santiago. By their hundreds if not by their thousands. Hence (pure guessing on my behalf), you get a Compostela for these two very traditional modes of pilgrimage. Especially on sailing boats - you can be just a passenger without having to be involved in navigation.I wasn't completely joking, I do think the horse should get the Compostela.
I suspect that 200 yrs ago, if you were carried to SdC on a hand-drawn cart by your family (or perhaps retainers) then you would have been greeted like any other pilgrim.That's where the "traditional method" comes into play ... people sometimes argue that riding a horse is physically demanding. But (pure guessing on my behalf) that's not the point. Traditional pilgrims of yore did travel to Santiago on horseback and traditional pilgrims of yore did travel by non-motorised ships to Santiago. By their hundreds if not by their thousands. Hence (pure guessing on my behalf), you get a Compostela for these two very traditional modes of pilgrimage. Especially on sailing boats - you can be just a passenger without having to be involved in navigation.
I think that is the confusion as I understood as e-bikes types in the US are often lumped together...but most common seems to be the throttle controlled electric engine that does not require any pedaling to achieve motive power.In Spain, and numerous other EU countries, e-bike or bicicleta electrica is a bike for which you do not need a driver license; you do not need insurance; you have to pedal all the time while driving - if you don't pedal you don't move forwards; you cannot go faster than 25 km/h with the motor assisting you, if you use so much of you own power by pedalling that you go faster than 25 km/h than the motor switches itself off completely.
Everything else on two wheels (whether electrical motor or gas powered motor) is considered as a motorised vehicle and needs a driver licence; insurance; and there is a legal age limit for using it.
Traditional pilgrims of yore did travel to Santiago on horseback and traditional pilgrims of yore did travel by non-motorised ships to Santiago.
I suspect that 200 yrs ago, if you were carried to SdC on a hand-drawn cart by your family (or perhaps retainers) then you would have been greeted like any other pilgrim.
I am not sure. I wonder whether you are confusing something with a diploma that the Spanish Tourism Ministry had introduced for the Holy Year 1965. It was not awarded by the Cathedral.And sometime in the not-too-distant past, you could get a Compostela by driving to Santiago, I believe. All you had to do was show up at the Cathedral. But I suspect that driving to Galicia was quite the adventure back in the 1960s.
You are probably right. I'd thought read it somewhere but I can't locate the reference. If it did happen, it was only for a brief period. But I don't think anybody was asking, because it wasn't a requirement. And I doubt they were giving you a choice for a religious or cultural Compostela either.I am not sure. I wonder whether you are confusing something with a diploma that the Spanish Tourism Ministry had introduced for the Holy Year 1965. It was not awarded by the Cathedral.
The Compostela text mentioning mode of travel and minimum distance only dates from the redesign in 2014. Very recent. The distance certificate was introduced at the same time. The first two Compostelas I received made no reference to distance or mode of travel. Or to receiving the sacraments either.The current text of the Compostela describes the mode of travel of the holder but the text about confession, absolution and the Eucharist has disappeared from the contemporary Compostela.
Not quite so simple I believe, though car drivers could obtain a Compostela.And sometime in the not-too-distant past, you could get a Compostela by driving to Santiago, I believe. All you had to do was show up at the Cathedral. But I suspect that driving to Galicia was quite the adventure back in the 1960s.
Thank you. My main point is that we ought to be aware of these facts and these changes when we make pronouncements about what the Compostela is, why it is awarded and who ought to get it or should not get it in our personal opinions.The Compostela text mentioning mode of travel and minimum distance only dates from the redesign in 2014. Very recent. The distance certificate was introduced at the same time. The first two Compostelas I received made no reference to distance or mode of travel. Or to receiving the sacraments either.
He is expressing an opinion. In his subjective view, how a person who cannot walk as freely as he rest of us arrives in Santiago is of no importance to him. I agree.Really? 250W street legal eBike (or e-Trike) and a petrol engine … pray tell me the “no difference”.
Exactly.Isn’t this all rather ‘academic’ anyway? Why worry?
If a person decides to break the rules for getting a Compostela, they are hardly going to tell anyone in the Pilgrim’s office are they? Just like those doing it by coach….
Or maybe there will be a e-bike checkpoint on the way into Santiago? To check the type of ebike.
Apart from the fact that both have religious roots they are fundamentally different in almost every aspect. Though as you say probably best discussed elsewhere.On a side note, something I haven't seen here (and would probably be better for another post) is comparing the past and present Camino with the past, and present Hajj.
I would guess that the same Albergues that refuse pack transport and suitcases, with certain exceptions for disability etc, will start to refuse e-bikes with the same sorts of exceptions.Isn’t this all rather ‘academic’ anyway? Why worry?
If a person decides to break the rules for getting a Compostela, they are hardly going to tell anyone in the Pilgrim’s office are they? Just like those doing it by coach….
Or maybe there will be a e-bike checkpoint on the way into Santiago? To check the type of ebike.
You've obviously never tried to bus The Camino. Autocarres, Monbus, ALSA and all the rest do their level best (masonic reference thereThey all forms of motorised transport no different from taking a bus
Despite all this discourse here, you are welcome to ride an E-bike along the Camino. Nobody's stopping you or anyone.Having discussed removing e-bikes from the camino routes, has anybody (apart from Kathar1na) recognised that the EV3 (EuroVelo3) shares much of the camino route to Compostela from Scandinavia. The countries that maintain the EV3 gain support via EU regional grants … the EV3 is not far from our house in France. EV3 does not distinguish between bicycles.
I've only used them in Spain. All I meant to say is that I experienced that they're very easy to ride compared to a purely pedal bicycle. (Edit: And possibly the pilgrim office agrees with that, which is why they've disallowed them?)Was that in Spain or in the USA?
I am not sure that this is sufficiently clear: in Spain, these e-bikes that are legally equivalent with traditional bikes cannot go faster than 25 km/h when assisted and the motor is limited to 250 W. And the motor provides assistance only while pedalling. The assistance is progressive - the faster you ride the less assistance you get from the motor. This is an EU wide standard - it is not a world wide standard.
In Spain, everything else that does not correspond to all these 3 technical requirements is classified as ciclomotores and not as bicicletas eléctricas.
In other words, what is an electric bike in your country is not necessarily a bicicleta electrica in Spain.
I have no opinion on the technical details of what qualifies as an electric bicycle because I know nothing about that. And I never said anything about that.I don' t agree. Technical specifications are not an opinion. I had a look at the definition of electric bike in Wikipedia. EN, ES, DE and FR. Wikipedia articles are not always correct but they provide a pretty good idea of what people mean by words they use in their own language. I recommend this method. It dawned on me that, at least in the past, some posters have written extensively on this topic without being aware of what is understood by a bicicleta electrica on Spain.
What is an opinion is whether users of bicicletas electricas ought to get a Compostela or not if the poster could decide; whether it should be forbidden to ride on certain trails; and so on. I did not participate in this exchange of opinions.
You're fine. There are a lot of posts on this thread with a lot of different information. I understand.FWIW: My posts are addressed to the conversation thread as a whole.
If you are saying that the rider should not, I think you are saying that you don’t ride horses much. It takes a lot of strength and stamina to ride that distance, sometimes up and down steep hills, on a horse.I wasn't completely joking, I do think the horse should get the Compostela.
I am sure that if a horse applied and answered all the questions properly, the Pilgrim Office would be happy to grant them a compostelaIf you are saying that the rider should not, I think you are saying that you don’t ride horses much. It takes a lot of strength and stamina to ride that distance, sometimes up and down steep hills, on a horse.
I think I liked that idea best: the horse AND the rider should get the Compostela. Aren't there some sort of animal rights laws in the EU that would cover that?If you are saying that the rider should not, I think you are saying that you don’t ride horses much. It takes a lot of strength and stamina to ride that distance, sometimes up and down steep hills, on a horse.
I have a creeping sense of horror that before long, someone will be suggesting that accompanying dogs should also get a compostela.I think I liked that idea best: the horse AND the rider should get the Compostela. Aren't there some sort of animal rights laws in the EU that would cover that?
People have already gone down that road.I have a creeping sense of horror that before long, someone will be suggesting that accompanying dogs should also get a compostela.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?