Terry Callery
Chi Walker
Recently I published a book about my experience walking the Camino Frances and I was surprise by a recent negative review of the book from a veteran Camino pilgrim. I was very honest in the book both about my recent divorce as a motivating factor to undertake the pilgrimage and about my struggles with alcohol. I also describe myself in the book as a "Cultural Catholic" someone educated by Benedictine monks who lost his faith while in his early 20's studying philosophy at Yale University. I write about the spiritual journey that I took in tandem with the physical journey and for me the repetition (like a mantra) of long hours of walking was a gateway for Zen meditation and mindfulness. I write about finding the "infinite moment" and reflect that a person of faith might call the same experience "walking in grace". I nurture a Universalist idea of "one world" that
does away with the lens of "us and them". I quote from Father Joe who says "Yes there are two types of people-those who divide the world into two types of people and those of us who do not."
Then I see this review which was a two stars out of five.
One of the distinctions learned while walking the Camino is "Are You a Pilgrim?" or "Are You a Tourist?". For Mr. Callery, he seems to be more in the tourist category. There is some nice historical background provided, but the journey and the flow of the trip seem disjointed. Mr. Callery seems to resist the idea of a spiritual journey. There's a lot of "I" and "Me", "Zen" and "Chi" - the simple Camino lesson of gratitude is less evident. Staying in private rooms, eating most meals alone and walking a faith-less journey is just one way to walk the Camino. There's is no "right way" or "wrong way" to "do" the Camino. That said, the Camino as a pilgrimage can nurture the soul and bring us closer to God with a sense of optimism. Mr. Callery's story is more of a glass "half-empty" experience.
So my question to the Forum is this--- Is there really a division among people on the Camino the "Elitist" walking in Christian faith as the "true pilgrims" ....and all others who have other beliefs (Zen/mindfulness/secular) are all "tourist"?
does away with the lens of "us and them". I quote from Father Joe who says "Yes there are two types of people-those who divide the world into two types of people and those of us who do not."
Then I see this review which was a two stars out of five.
One of the distinctions learned while walking the Camino is "Are You a Pilgrim?" or "Are You a Tourist?". For Mr. Callery, he seems to be more in the tourist category. There is some nice historical background provided, but the journey and the flow of the trip seem disjointed. Mr. Callery seems to resist the idea of a spiritual journey. There's a lot of "I" and "Me", "Zen" and "Chi" - the simple Camino lesson of gratitude is less evident. Staying in private rooms, eating most meals alone and walking a faith-less journey is just one way to walk the Camino. There's is no "right way" or "wrong way" to "do" the Camino. That said, the Camino as a pilgrimage can nurture the soul and bring us closer to God with a sense of optimism. Mr. Callery's story is more of a glass "half-empty" experience.
So my question to the Forum is this--- Is there really a division among people on the Camino the "Elitist" walking in Christian faith as the "true pilgrims" ....and all others who have other beliefs (Zen/mindfulness/secular) are all "tourist"?