Remove ads on the forum by becoming a donating member. More here. |
---|
Sorry to be such a pain, repeating my obsession about stuff carried, but how on earth do you fill a 60l pack?markss said:Ion,
I purchased an Osprey's Aether 60 (Mens size large) over the internet and found it perfect in every respect! The quality is very good; it was durable, well fitting and comfortable and also adequate for carrying everything including the extra water, food and odd botttle of wine that I bought from time to time along the way. As a point of reference, I am 6'2", weighed 180 lbs. at the beginning of the Camino, dropping to about 165 by the end. Maybe I didn't carrry enough food after all
You might end up paying a fortune in restocking fees and return postage under your method of ordering so many backpacks just for the sake of trying to determine a preference. There are all kinds of websites that review various features and make comparisons for you. Proper fit and structure of the pack is key as the pack will become part of you as you walk.
Buen Camino!
andy.d said:If you carry a rucksack like this, you can have tea properly,
Andy
andy.d said:If you carry a rucksack like this, you can have tea properly,
Andy
Hi Lia,Lia said:I think I might need some help on this subject.
You see I have read through this thread and checked out most of the ones that other people have recommended. The thing is that most of them are simply beyond the range of my purse.
So am now wondering if I have actually brought the wrong one.
I have had a Berghaus before and it always performed well and I am use to travelling light.
But I have never walked the Camino, or ever walked that fer either.
Would someone who knows better than me please take a look and give me their considered opinion.
Thank you.
http://www.gaynors.co.uk/productdetail. ... 0501430005
.the happiness of the pilgrim with her backpack
is determined more by what goes on between her ears
than the pack she puts on her back
Mysticl, I cannot tell how much bushwalking/trekking /backpacking you have done, and whether you realise that the term ultra-light can also mean many other things when it comes to long distance hiking. The nice sales pitch video does much to avoid discussing the compromises of this type of design, but here are a few:Mysticl said:I too am considering the Gossamer Gorilla or Gossamer Mariposa ... both bags are larger than I expect to need BUT they have a roll top closing and I think their size more or less scales down to how full you pack them. The one I am considering weighs in a 658 grams or about 1.5 pounds. One of the lightest bags I've seen online.
snip
Would love to hear opinions.
Sojourner47 said:Just for interest, my Deuter 20L pack, fully loaded including 1 litre of water and trail snacks comes in at 4.1kgs. I do have a smaller, lighter daysac which would be 400grms less but have no room for more food or jacket/fleece if carried rather than worn.
This is complete kit for Camino Frances start this Friday.
I tried packing one of your previous packing lists, and only just managed to get it into a 30li pack with 1 li of water and no food bag. What have you done to get down to 20li?Sojourner47 said:Just for interest, my Deuter 20L pack, fully loaded including 1 litre of water and trail snacks comes in at 4.1kgs. I do have a smaller, lighter daysac which would be 400grms less but have no room for more food or jacket/fleece if carried rather than worn.
This is complete kit for Camino Frances start this Friday.
dougfitz said:I tried packing one of your previous packing lists, and only just managed to get it into a 30li pack with 1 li of water and no food bag. What have you done to get down to 20li?
Regards,
falcon269 said:And the brand is?...
falcon269 said:Can you post a photo of this gem?? Thanks in advance.
Sojourner47 said:falcon269 said:Can you post a photo of this gem?? Thanks in advance.
I haven't the technical expertise. :mrgreen:
How does one post pictures on here?
If a liter of water is a kilogram, are you taking just .6kg of equipment?Total weight for next camino - 1.6kilograms, including water and trail snacks.
Hola Krsta,Krsta said:In your opinion how important is to have in camino backpack two compartments and breathable carrying system? Backpack with two compartments is easier to pack in the morning. I don't need to take out everything. With breathable carrying system I'm not sweat as much. But... I'll have small backpack (30-35 liters) so I take only basic stuff. Besides how important is how much I sweat during the pilgrimage if I do laundry every day? So maybe better idea is to buy simple and light backpack. What do you think about it?
Overview
Why is the Osprey Hornet is one of the hottest new backpacks of 2011? There are several reasons:
First, the Hornet series represents a radical change in the Osprey Design Philosophy away from their overbuilt backpacks to a more customizable design with removable features and lighter weight fabrics.
Second, this pack clearly signals Osprey Pack’s entry into the lightweight backpacking market, where consumers are interested in the improved comfort provided by ultralight gear.
Lastly, there’s the jaw-dropping fact that the Hornet 46 liter pack (2760 cubic inch) only weighs 25 oz fully configured or 19 oz without the Hornet’s optional 3.2 oz frame sheet and 2.8 oz floating pocket. That’s a coup for Osprey and puts them in an enviable market position for bringing lightweight backpacking to a mainstream audience.
Suspension System - 4.0 out of 5
Out of the box, the Hornet 46 has an internal foam frame sheet that weighs just 3.2 oz. In addition, lightweight plastic rods run down the inside side corners of the pack, providing excellent load transfer to the hip belt. The frame sheet provides the pack with a stiffer feel, particularly when the pack is not stuffed full, but can be removed to save weight.
The Hornet 46 has a thin 5/8 inch webbing hip belt with un-padded oblong side fins that wrap around the back of the hips. For people who have never used an ultralight backpack, the lack of a padded hip belt may feel a bit strange, however given the lighter loads that you will carry, having a thick hip belt is unnecessary and only adds more weight to a pack.
Still, the Hornet hip belt has some deficiencies. First, the hip belt pockets are set too far back on the wings of the hip belt, making them very difficult to access while wearing the pack. A better solution would have been to leave the pockets off completely or sell them as an accessory add-on. On the flip side, the hip belt adjustment system is easy to use and provides a very secure fit.
Finally, the Hornet is outfitted with perforated shoulder straps lined with mesh fabric for enhanced ventilation like many of Osprey’s other packs. While comfortable with lighter loads, they are considerably less padded than on Osprey’s other packs and can lead to shoulder soreness on higher mileage days when carrying heavier loads.
I'd sure recommend if you buy a pack online that you make sure there's a good return/refund policy. Just like with boots or hiking shoes, it's wise to try before you buy. I was enamored with the light weight of the Go-Lite Jam 35, and that was the first pack I tried -- along with the slightly larger Jam 50. I'm lucky to live in the Denver area where we have three Go-Lite factory retail stores so I could try them on with a load and walk around the store. My first impression was that they both felt quite good with 15-lbs (6.8 kg). But I did not buy on first impressions, and went to REI and tried several more conventional packs in that size range. While the empty packs all weighed more than the Go-Lite Jams, the extra weight was primarily in the internal frame system which helps to distribute the weight on one's back. I went back and tried the Go-Lite packs again before making a final decision, and decided on one of the conventional internal frame packs (Kestrel 38-L), which also has an adjustable suspension system and a built-in rain cover.capun said:Darn it, I went to check the GoLite Jams. they are now sold directly online and they have a sale.
$99.99 for the 35L!! and only 770g. They were Backpacker's Magazine Editor''s Choice. I may buy it and try to sell my wife's Gregory
http://www.golite.com/Jam-35L-Pack-Unisex-P46811.aspx
They have internal frame models that are very light weight. The frameless Jam is a great pack, but some will not like the way it carries. I describe it, somewhat unfairly, as a nylon sack with shoulder straps. Under 10kg, though, it is pretty comfortable, and you save a lot of empty weight.We bought the GoLite's straight from their website
I walked with a Gregory Z40 which Iliked a lot, but on my next camino I will not take a pack larger than a 30L. The more space you have the more you put in it. I had things I didnt use. It gets heavy after 29 days.
Dan
www.danscaminotravels.wordpress.com
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?