Some thoughts…
First, my own situation is that I have to book a long time in advance because of medical issues. I’m very glad of places that take bookings and sadly have to avoid those that don’t. It’s something I have to accept; I can’t be proud about it. I hope one day to arrive at a point where I can enjoy the ‘other’ side of the Camino in albergues. Instead, I chat when I walk, or when I stop in cafes, and see familiar faces. It is what it is. So, given this context…
I suspect that the OP is a few years/a decade or two ahead of time. I was struck on my recent Camino by the many pilgrims booking ahead, and the ways in which they did this: mostly finding telephone numbers online, sometimes through
Brierly or info sheets from Pilgrim Offices etc. And yet we’re also dealing with a system that only half enables this need for virtual/advance reservations. I found it intriguing that the Camino is both still outside of time—it still feels medieval, in the sense that many pilgrims can and do just wander from A to B to C until they figure something out for the night—whereas the Camino is also right here in the present, everyone networked, messages going up and down the route between pilgrims on WhatsApp, bookings flying through the ether. One foot in each camp. Maybe it has to be this way.
I think it’s probably shortsighted to imagine that the foot which is in the present won’t continue into future presents. This means that as tech improves—as networks become each year broader, firmer and more efficient, with supporting infrastructure and better accessibility—of course, the foot that is in this ‘present’ camp will step along, keeping in stride.
I don’t think it’s ridiculous to imagine that, in the fairly near future, all payments will be digital. We’re close to this now. It also isn’t ridiculous to imagine a system that includes both digital payments and bookings at the same time: so, at the time of an albergue receiving a payment, the bed would be crossed off automatically through the same, standardised booking system (eg app and website). This means that the bed would be immediately registered on the network as occupied, and everyone looking at the system would see this live-updated availability. It’s also possible that individuals would be registered to that same system and that poor behaviour on their part (eg, making three reservations for one night) would be either impossible or registered on the system as negative. This would be similar to what Airbnb does in reviewing guests as well as hosts (personally, I find this part of Airbnb strange and not very nice, even though I also understand it. I shudder at the idea of it applying to pilgrims and hope this never happens, certainly in any non-anonymous way).
But it could be that rather than there being a system solely for pilgrims, there will be a dominant bigger travel system—eg Booking.com but more advanced, a few years down the line and even more developed than it is now—and that use of it will be very standard. Could, instead, a new app aimed solely at caminos, or at thru-hikes, act in this way? Money is the issue here. I think anyone creating such an app/website/networked service would need to make a deal with the digital payment system it used (eg Worldpay, PayPal; probably unlikely), charge a small percentage to albergues for processing payments and bookings (ugh… although charges for card payments already exist) and/or make its profits from app sales in the way that,eg,
Wise Pilgrim does now. Ultimately, it would need to provide the simplest and quickest possible way for albergues and hostels to handle bookings and beds, otherwise it wouldn’t work.
I’m not saying that I think any of this is a good or bad idea, only that I suspect it will happen, if not very soon then at some point in the coming decades. This is because of the shift to digital: digital networks will continue to grow exponentially. This has pros and cons. It just
is.
But I do also think that, along the Camino, belief in what the Camino stands for is so strong that the primitive, organic aspects will be preserved. Cash-only Albergues even though everything has gone digital. Off-network ones. Walk-Ins only. People who dig in harder and harder to compensate for digitisation pulling the other way. It will reach an equilibrium, eventually, but right now is a period of rapid change. I think we have to make of it the best we can, collectively, and try to adapt to the new in such a way that the new becomes as good a thing as possible, for everyone concerned.