I work in a department in which we regularly assign a ‘graduating fieldwork assignment’ as a capstone. My world is adjacent in the sense that there is an ‘anthropology of tourism’ (though we do not cover that where I am), but I have worked closely with people who are in travel, tourism and/or heritage studies. Without having looked at the survey I would expect that as the student is in tourism:
1) the capstone project will, of necessity, reflect commercial interests
2) as an undergraduate project, it is meant to be a learning experience and will be far from a perfectly designed survey (making mistakes is kinda the point)
3) The survey itself will have all the requirements on it for the approvals, whom to contact, the supporting department, etc (If not, then local convention for the faculty differs for undergrads *or* it is a doomed project, but that is for the faculty supervisor to determine)
4) there’s been a big pile up here by a bunch of Anglos on a Spanish national student for studying a heritage/tourism domain in *their own country*… that’s a rather poor look, frankly.
5) the student does not likely need hundreds of people to reply, probably fewer than 20 (that would be typical), and the student will be tasked with analysis g parts of the process that stymied potential respondents, but I would suggest that the student consider the derision of their efforts to ask on a largely English language forum signals not so much their own failure as one of the recipients.
6) I wish that the OP invitation had a letter of introduction from the supervisor, but for an undergraduate project (apparently from one of the unis in Galicia) that may not be the custom.
This thread has been, with some exception, highly cranky, uncharitable and leaning toward the anti-scholarly and conspiratorial in terms of wildly flung accusations.
How regretable.
I wish
@AlbertoCamino all the best for the completion of the project.